Literature DB >> 8851553

Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

M L Spetch1, K Cheng, S E MacDonald.   

Abstract

Pigeons and humans searched on a touch-screen monitor for an unmarked goal located relative to an array of landmarks presented in varied screen locations. After training with the goal centered in various square arrays of 4 landmarks, humans, but not pigeons, transferred accurately to arrays with novel elements. Humans searched in the middle of expanded arrays, whereas pigeons preserved the distance and direction to a single landmark. When trained with the goal centered below 2 identical horizontally aligned landmarks, humans responded to horizontal expansions or contractions of the array by shifting their search vertically, preserving angles from landmarks to goal. Pigeons did not adjust their search vertically. Humans trained with a single landmark adjusted search distance when landmark size was changed. Both pigeons and humans use the configuration of a landmark array, but the underlying processes seem to differ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8851553     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.110.1.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  17 in total

1.  Behaviorism, latent learning, and cognitive maps: needed revisions in introductory psychology textbooks.

Authors:  Robert Jensen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

3.  Spatial decisions and cognitive strategies of monkeys and humans based on abstract spatial stimuli in rotation test.

Authors:  Tereza Nekovarova; Jan Nedvidek; Daniel Klement; Jan Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial integration during performance in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Julia E Schroeder; Cynthia D Fast
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Reorientation by features and geometry: Effects of healthy and degenerative age-related cognitive decline.

Authors:  Kevin Leonard; Viktoriya Vasylkiv; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Distance and direction, but not light cues, support response reversal learning.

Authors:  S L Wright; G M Martin; C M Thorpe; K Haley; D M Skinner
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies.

Authors:  Marcia L Spetch; Marise B Parent
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

8.  Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009-01-01

9.  Blocking between landmarks during 2-D (touchscreen) and 3-D (ARENA) search tasks with pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Jared Wong; Chad M Ruprecht; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Attributional and relational processing in pigeons.

Authors:  Dennis Garlick; Dana J Gant; Linda A W Brakel; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.