Literature DB >> 31916194

Reorientation by features and geometry: Effects of healthy and degenerative age-related cognitive decline.

Kevin Leonard1, Viktoriya Vasylkiv1, Debbie M Kelly2,3.   

Abstract

The ability to orient is critical for mobile species. Two visual cues, geometry (e.g., distance and direction) and features (e.g., colour and texture) are often used when establishing one's orientation. Previous research has shown the use of these cues, in particular, geometry, may decline with healthy aging. Few studies have examined whether degenerative aging processes show similar time points for the decline of geometry use. The present study examined this issue by training adult and aged mice from two strains, a healthy wild-type and an Alzheimer's model, to search for a hidden platform in a rectangular water maze. The shape of the maze provided geometric information, and distinctive features were displayed on the walls. Following training, manipulations to the features were made to examine whether the mice were able to use the features and geometry, and whether they showed a preference between these two cue types. Results showed that although Alzheimer's transgenic mice were slower to learn the task, overall age rather than strain, was associated with a degradation in use of geometry. However, the presence of seemingly uninformative features (due to their redundancy) facilitated the use of geometry. Additionally, when features and geometry provided conflicting information, only young wild-type mice showed a primary use of features. Our results suggest the failure to use geometry may be a generalized function of aging, and not a diagnostic feature of degeneration for mice. Whether this is also the case for other mammals, such as humans for which the mouse is an important medical model, remains to be examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative cognition; Configural learning; Cue competition; Reorientation; Spatial learning

Year:  2020        PMID: 31916194     DOI: 10.3758/s13420-019-00401-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  43 in total

1.  Spatial disorientation in Alzheimer's disease: the remembrance of things passed.

Authors:  Anthony M Monacelli; Laura A Cushman; Voyko Kavcic; Charles J Duffy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease: insights from imaging and behavioral studies.

Authors:  Ségolène Lithfous; André Dufour; Olivier Després
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 10.895

3.  Geometry, features, and panoramic views: ants in rectangular arenas.

Authors:  Antoine Wystrach; Ken Cheng; Sebastian Sosa; Guy Beugnon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-10

Review 4.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Janellen Huttenlocher; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

5.  Experience with featural-cue reliability influences featural- and geometric-cue use by mice (Mus musculus).

Authors:  Kevin Leonard; Na Tian; Tammy L Ivanco; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Characterization of the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: part 2. Behavioral and cognitive changes.

Authors:  Roxanne Sterniczuk; Michael C Antle; Frank M Laferla; Richard H Dyck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics.

Authors:  John Hardy; Dennis J Selkoe
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cognitive and non-cognitive behaviors in the triple transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease expressing mutated APP, PS1, and Mapt (3xTg-AD).

Authors:  Mohammed Filali; Robert Lalonde; Peter Theriault; Carl Julien; Frederic Calon; Emmanuel Planel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Guido De Filippo; Angus B Inkster; Stephen E G Lea; Jan De Houwer; Rudi D'Hooge; Tom Beckers; Andy J Wills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 10.  APP mouse models for Alzheimer's disease preclinical studies.

Authors:  Hiroki Sasaguri; Per Nilsson; Shoko Hashimoto; Kenichi Nagata; Takashi Saito; Bart De Strooper; John Hardy; Robert Vassar; Bengt Winblad; Takaomi C Saido
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.