Literature DB >> 17328377

Age and sex differences in children's spatial search strategies.

Marcia L Spetch1, Marise B Parent.   

Abstract

Male and female children, 3, 4, and 5 years old, searched for a sticker that was hidden in 1 of 15 linearly aligned boxes. Two identical bear-shaped landmarks cued the sticker location, which was always in the middle of 3 boxes that separated the two landmarks. The absolute locations of the landmarks and sticker varied across training trials, but the distance in relation to each other remained constant. Training continued until the child chose the correct box first for 3 consecutive trials or for a maximum of 20 trials. Striking age and sex differences emerged in acquisition: The percentage of children who reached criterion increased over age groups to 100% for the boys but stayed at approximately 20% for the girls. A landmark expansion test (with the landmarks moved farther apart) given to children who met criterion revealed that most of these children chose the middle location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328377     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  Connecting the dots: children's use of a systematic figure to facilitate mapping and search.

Authors:  D H Uttal; V H Gregg; L S Tan; M H Chamberlin; A Sines
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2001-05

Review 2.  The evolution of sex differences in spatial ability.

Authors:  Catherine M Jones; Victoria A Braithwaite; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils.

Authors:  T S Collett; B A Cartwright; B A Smith
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.

Authors:  D Voyer; S Voyer; M P Bryden
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Early sex differences in spatial skill.

Authors:  S C Levine; J Huttenlocher; A Taylor; A Langrock
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

6.  A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula).

Authors:  Juli E Jones; Elena Antoniadis; Sara J Shettleworth; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Early development of scaling ability.

Authors:  Marina Vasilyeva; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-09

8.  Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch; K Cheng; S E MacDonald
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  An information-processing analysis of children's accuracy in predicting the appearance of rotated stimuli.

Authors:  R A Rosser; S S Ensing; P J Glider; S Lane
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1984-12
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Visually Scaling Distance from Memory: Do Visible Midline Boundaries Make a Difference?

Authors:  Alycia M Hund; Jodie M Plumert; Kara M Recker
Journal:  Spat Cogn Comput       Date:  2020-02-25

2.  Young Children's Representation of Locations in a Series: A Front-Back Representation or an Ordinal Representation?

Authors:  Qingfen Hu; Yuejia Fu; Yi Shao
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Development of the Mental Number Line Representation of Numbers 0-10 and Its Relationship to Mental Arithmetic.

Authors:  Anat Feldman; Andrea Berger
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.