Literature DB >> 20607101

Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Kenneth J Leising1, Aaron P Blaisdell.   

Abstract

Early work on spatial navigation evaluated what stimuli (kinesthetic or extra-maze) support small-scale navigation and the nature of the underlying learning (place versus response) process. Contemporary research has focused primarily on how cues interact to determine spatial search. This review covers three general findings from research on landmark-based spatial search in vertebrates. First, pigeons and rats encode simple spatial maps in both open-field and touchscreen environments. Second, a nascent literature shows how simple maps can be integrated into complex maps through higher-order associative processes. The spatial-integration hypothesis provides an associative mechanism for spatial mapping that serves as an alternative to a previously posed configural mechanism. Finally, the evidence for associative cue-competition phenomena in landmark learning is reviewed-focusing on blocking and overshadowing. These findings support a role for associative learning in spatial tasks and provide a powerful explanatory framework for understanding cue integration and competition effects in landmark learning.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20607101      PMCID: PMC2895939          DOI: 10.3819/ccbr.2009.40010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev        ISSN: 1911-4745


  60 in total

Review 1.  Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function.

Authors:  Lucia F Jacobs; Françoise Schenk
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Spontaneous alternation behavior.

Authors:  W N DEMBER; H FOWLER
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The role of extramaze cues in place and response learning.

Authors:  D P SCHARLOCK
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-10

Review 4.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Marcia L Spetch; Debbie M Kelly; Verner P Bingman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis.

Authors:  A P Blaisdell; A S Bristol; L M Gunther; R R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1998-07

6.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H I Savastano; R R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Allocentric spatial learning by hippocampectomised rats: a further test of the "spatial mapping" and "working memory" theories of hippocampal function.

Authors:  R G Morris; J J Hagan; J N Rawlins
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1986-11

8.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans.

Authors:  M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1995-04

9.  Blocking of spatial control by landmarks in rats.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 10.  Do animals have cognitive maps?

Authors:  A T Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatial integration during performance in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Julia E Schroeder; Cynthia D Fast
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Extinction and spontaneous recovery of spatial behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Jared Wong; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Pigeons exhibit contextual cueing to both simple and complex backgrounds.

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Yuejia Teng; Leyre Castro
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Blocking between landmarks during 2-D (touchscreen) and 3-D (ARENA) search tasks with pigeons.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Jared Wong; Chad M Ruprecht; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Feature-positive discriminations during a spatial-search task with humans.

Authors:  Chad M Ruprecht; Joshua E Wolf; Nina I Quintana; Kenneth J Leising
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.926

6.  Are Distal and Proximal Visual Cues Equally Important during Spatial Learning in Mice? A Pilot Study of Overshadowing in the Spatial Domain.

Authors:  Marie Hébert; Jan Bulla; Denis Vivien; Véronique Agin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Interactions of spatial strategies producing generalization gradient and blocking: A computational approach.

Authors:  Laurent Dollé; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Agnès Guillot; Mehdi Khamassi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.