Literature DB >> 8847450

Assessment of left ventricular volume and mass by cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anterior myocardial infarction intra-observer and inter-observer variability on contour detection.

N A Matheijssen1, L H Baur, J H Reiber, E A van der Velde, P R van Dijkman, R J van der Geest, A de Roos, E E van der Wall.   

Abstract

Remodeling of the left ventricle after myocardial infarction can be documented by calculation of left ventricular volume and mass, using endocardial and epicardial tracings of multilevel multiphase short-axis cine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging series. We assessed left ventricular volume and mass from 8 slices and during 12 phases of the cardiac cycle in seven patients with an anterior wall myocardial infarction; one patient was studied twice, leaving eight MR examinations to be evaluated. Purpose of this study was to assess the intra-observer and inter-observer variability of epicardial volume, endocardial volume, and left ventricular mass from contours manually traced by two independent observers. For the eight MR examinations, epicardial volume was found to be 292 +/- 51 ml (mean +/- SD) at end-diastole, which decreased to 237 +/- 55 ml at end-systole. Endocardial volume was 141 +/- 31 ml at end-diastole, which decreased to 79 +/- 27 ml at end-systole. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 45 +/- 8%. Mean left ventricular mass, when averaged over all patient studies and all phases, was 159 +/- 30 g. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability were found to be 3.5% and 5.2% for endocardial volume, 2.0% and 2.5% for epicardial volume, and 3.6% and 3.6% for left ventricular mass, respectively. The contour analysis showed a statistically significant phase effect in the endocardial contour in the midventricular slices, which was resolved after establishing a more precise definition for the tracing of the endocardial border. In conclusion, left ventricular volume and mass in patients with an anterior wall myocardial infarction can be assessed with high reproducibility and reliability from manual contour tracings. A precise protocol for the definition of endocardial and epicardial contours is required to obtain reproducible and reliable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8847450     DOI: 10.1007/bf01798113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Card Imaging        ISSN: 0167-9899


  9 in total

1.  Automated identification of left ventricular borders from spin-echo magnetic resonance images. Experimental and clinical feasibility studies.

Authors:  S R Fleagle; D R Thedens; J C Ehrhardt; T D Scholz; D J Skorton
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Functional evaluation of the heart with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  C B Higgins; W Holt; P Pflugfelder; U Sechtem
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Echocardiography in serial evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function: importance of image acquisition, quantitation, and physiologic variability in clinical and investigational applications.

Authors:  H F Kuecherer; L L Kee; G Modin; M D Cheitlin; N B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Cardiac function. Quantification with magnetic resonance and computed tomography.

Authors:  A M Wood; K R Hoffmann; M J Lipton
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Reproducibility of left ventricular volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  E P Gordon; I Schnittger; P J Fitzgerald; P Williams; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Regional differences in function within noninfarcted myocardium during left ventricular remodeling.

Authors:  C M Kramer; J A Lima; N Reichek; V A Ferrari; M R Llaneras; L C Palmon; I T Yeh; B Tallant; L Axel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Determination of left ventricular mass by magnetic resonance imaging in hearts deformed by acute infarction.

Authors:  E P Shapiro; W J Rogers; R Beyar; R L Soulen; E A Zerhouni; J A Lima; J L Weiss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Sectional and segmental variability of left ventricular function: experimental and clinical studies using ultrafast computed tomography.

Authors:  A J Feiring; J A Rumberger; S J Reiter; S M Collins; D J Skorton; M Rees; M L Marcus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Measurement of left ventricular volume after anterior myocardial infarction: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, echo and radionuclide ventriculography.

Authors:  S Prasad; D Pennell
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Accuracy of short-axis cardiac MRI automatically derived from scout acquisitions in free-breathing and breath-holding modes.

Authors:  M G Danilouchkine; J J M Westenberg; B P F Lelieveldt; J H C Reiber
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 3.  Cardiac imaging to identify patients at risk for developing heart failure after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Clerio F Azevedo; Susan Cheng; João A C Lima
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  Cardiac anatomy, mass and function--great vessels.

Authors:  W Kenn
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Assessment of left ventricular function: visual or quantitative?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  CMR-determined scar volume: predictive for ventricular tachycardias?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; K Zeppenfeld; J J Bax; H M Siebelink; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Does heart rate influence CMR image quality of the coronary vessel wall?

Authors:  E E van der Wall; E J S Kröner; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Aortic stiffness in type-1 diabetes mellitus; beware of hypertension.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; H M Siebelink; A J Scholte; M J Schalij
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Can left ventricular function parameters be determined within half of the time with MRI?

Authors:  Leo H B Baur
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Improved recovery of regional left ventricular function after PCI of chronic total occlusion in STEMI patients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study of the randomized controlled EXPLORE trial.

Authors:  Joëlle Elias; Ivo M van Dongen; Loes P Hoebers; Dagmar M Ouweneel; Bimmer E P M Claessen; Truls Råmunddal; Peep Laanmets; Erlend Eriksen; René J van der Schaaf; Dan Ioanes; Robin Nijveldt; Jan G Tijssen; Alexander Hirsch; José P S Henriques
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.