Literature DB >> 8846914

Selection intensity for codon bias and the effective population size of Escherichia coli.

O G Berg1.   

Abstract

The selection intensity for codon bias and the synonymous diversity have been used in the recent literature to estimate the effective population size of Escherichia coli. The results have varied between (10)5 and (10)8. It is suggested here that most of this disparity can be explained by a model that accounts for the population structure of the species. Thus it is assumed that weakly selected characters, like synonymous substitutions, are selectively fixed within individual lines or colonies but spread throughout the population in an essentially neutral way when colonies replace one another. In this way, the effective population size that enters expressions for the codon bias will be that of an individual colony, which, if hitchhiking effects are considered, can be a very small number. The effective population size that appears together with the mutation rate in expressions for the synonymous diversity, on the other hand, will be related to the total number of colonies that make up the species and can be a very large number.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8846914      PMCID: PMC1207134     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  11 in total

1.  The evolutionary selection of DNA base pairs in gene-regulatory binding sites.

Authors:  O G Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic variability and effective population size when local extinction and recolonization of subpopulations are frequent.

Authors:  T Maruyama; M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Evolution of Escherichia coli during growth in a constant environment.

Authors:  R B Helling; C N Vargas; J Adams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Periodic selection and hitchhiking in a bacterial population.

Authors:  O G Berg
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 6.  Assessing the genetic structure of microbial populations.

Authors:  R E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Periodic selection, infectious gene exchange and the genetic structure of E. coli populations.

Authors:  B R Levin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Detecting selective sweeps in naturally occurring Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D S Guttman; D E Dykhuizen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The population genetics of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D L Hartl; D E Dykhuizen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Selection intensity for codon bias.

Authors:  D L Hartl; E N Moriyama; S A Sawyer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity.

Authors:  J R Pannell; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mutators, population size, adaptive landscape and the adaptation of asexual populations of bacteria.

Authors:  O Tenaillon; B Toupance; H Le Nagard; F Taddei; B Godelle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Codon usage and selection on proteins.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Jonathan Dushoff; Michael M Desai; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Hong Qin; Wei Biao Wu; Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolutionary selection between alternative modes of gene regulation.

Authors:  Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  An extensive study of mutation and selection on the wobble nucleotide in tRNA anticodons in fungal mitochondrial genomes.

Authors:  Malisa Carullo; Xuhua Xia
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Codon bias in Escherichia coli: the influence of codon context on mutation and selection.

Authors:  O G Berg; P J Silva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Lineage-specific differences in the amino acid substitution process.

Authors:  Snehalata Huzurbazar; Grigory Kolesov; Steven E Massey; Katherine C Harris; Alexander Churbanov; David A Liberles
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Mutation bias favors protein folding stability in the evolution of small populations.

Authors:  Raul Mendez; Miriam Fritsche; Markus Porto; Ugo Bastolla
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Transition from positive to neutral in mutation fixation along with continuing rising fitness in thermal adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Toshihiko Kishimoto; Leo Iijima; Makoto Tatsumi; Naoaki Ono; Ayana Oyake; Tomomi Hashimoto; Moe Matsuo; Masato Okubo; Shingo Suzuki; Kotaro Mori; Akiko Kashiwagi; Chikara Furusawa; Bei-Wen Ying; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.