Literature DB >> 8001789

Selection intensity for codon bias.

D L Hartl1, E N Moriyama, S A Sawyer.   

Abstract

The patterns of nonrandom usage of synonymous codons (codon bias) in enteric bacteria were analyzed. Poisson random field (PRF) theory was used to derive the expected distribution of frequencies of nucleotides differing from the ancestral state at aligned sites in a set of DNA sequences. This distribution was applied to synonymous nucleotide polymorphisms and amino acid polymorphisms in the gnd and putP genes of Escherichia coli. For the gnd gene, the average intensity of selection against disfavored synonymous codons was estimated as approximately 7.3 x 10(-9); this value is significantly smaller than the estimated selection intensity against selectively disfavored amino acids in observed polymorphisms (2.0 x 10(-8)), but it is approximately of the same order of magnitude. The selection coefficients for optimal synonymous codons estimated from PRF theory were consistent with independent estimates based on codon usage for threonine and glycine. Across 118 genes in E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium, the distribution of estimated selection coefficients, expressed as multiples of the effective population size, has a mean and standard deviation of 0.5 +/- 0.4. No significant differences were found in the degree of codon bias between conserved positions and replacement positions, suggesting that translational misincorporation is not an important selective constraint among synonymous polymorphic codons in enteric bacteria. However, across the first 100 codons of the genes, conserved amino acids with identical codons have significantly greater codon bias than that of either synonymous or nonidentical codons, suggesting that there are unique selective constraints, perhaps including mRNA secondary structures, in this part of the coding region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8001789      PMCID: PMC1206133     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  The Distribution of Gene Frequencies Under Irreversible Mutation.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1938-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.

Authors:  M Bulmer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Spontaneous mutation.

Authors:  J W Drake
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 16.830

4.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Codon frequencies in 119 individual genes confirm consistent choices of degenerate bases according to genome type.

Authors:  R Grantham; C Gautier; M Gouy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-05-10       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes.

Authors:  A Eyre-Walker; M Bulmer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Evolutionary genetics of the proline permease gene (putP) and the control region of the proline utilization operon in populations of Salmonella and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K Nelson; R K Selander
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Codon selection in yeast.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen; B D Hall
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.

Authors:  H Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total
  96 in total

1.  The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation.

Authors:  G A McVean; B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Nucleotide polymorphism at the RpII215 gene in Drosophila subobscura. Weak selection on synonymous mutations.

Authors:  A Llopart; M Aguadé
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Long-term microclimatic stress causes rapid adaptive radiation of kaiABC clock gene family in a cyanobacterium, Nostoc linckia, from "Evolution Canyons" I and II, Israel.

Authors:  Volodymyr Dvornyk; Oxana Vinogradova; Eviatar Nevo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Polymorphism and divergence for island-model species.

Authors:  John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila.

Authors:  H Akashi; S W Schaeffer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Selection in a subdivided population with local extinction and recolonization.

Authors:  Joshua L Cherry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes.

Authors:  Swaine L Chen; William Lee; Alison K Hottes; Lucy Shapiro; Harley H McAdams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence for diploid selection models with arbitrary dominance.

Authors:  Scott Williamson; Adi Fledel-Alon; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Some consequences of demographic stochasticity in population genetics.

Authors:  Todd L Parsons; Christopher Quince; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.