Literature DB >> 16286699

Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration.

Lionel H Zupan1, Daniel M Merfeld.   

Abstract

We investigated if human ocular torsion (OT) and perceived roll (PR) are elicited in response to either dynamic interaural linear acceleration or dynamic roll tilt of the gravito-inertial force (GIF). We expanded a previous study [26] that measured only OT across a limited frequency-range (from 0.35 Hz to 1 Hz) by simultaneously measuring OT and PR at three very low (0.01, 0.02 and 0.05 Hz) and one high (1 Hz) frequencies. Three experimental conditions were investigated: (1) Y-Upright with acceleration along the interaural (Y) axis while upright, (2) Y-Supine with acceleration along the Y-axis while supine, and (3) Z-RED with acceleration along the rostro-caudal Z) axis with right-ear-down (RED). OT was measured by video-oculography, while PR was measured by use of a somatosensory bar. OT and PR were qualitatively different. Large OT responses were measured for Y-Upright and Y-Supine, while large perceived roll responses were observed for Y-Upright and Z-RED. OT for Z-RED was small, and PR for Y-Supine was absent. In conclusion, OT and PR appear governed by qualitatively different neural mechanisms. OT appears mostly influenced by central low-pass filtering of interaural graviceptor cues, while PR appears mostly influenced by roll tilt of the GIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16286699      PMCID: PMC1752195     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  34 in total

1.  An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body positions in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  U J Bucher; F Mast; N Bischof
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Anatomy and physiology of otolith-controlled ocular counter-rolling.

Authors:  C H Markham
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1989

3.  Is an internal model of head orientation necessary for oculomotor control?

Authors:  Michael Barnett-Cowan; Richard T Dyde; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths in the processing structure of the subjective zenith.

Authors:  S Glasauer
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-05-22       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Modeling human vestibular responses during eccentric rotation and off vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1995

6.  Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function.

Authors:  S G Diamond; C H Markham
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Ocular torsion on earth and in weightlessness.

Authors:  L R Young; B K Lichtenberg; A P Arrott; T A Crites; C M Oman; E R Edelman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Human ocular counterrolling induced by varying linear accelerations.

Authors:  B K Lichtenberg; L R Young; A P Arrott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics.

Authors:  G D Paige; D L Tomko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Scott J Wood; Millard F Reschke; Laura A Sarmiento; Gilles Clément
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Roll tilt psychophysics in rhesus monkeys during vestibular and visual stimulation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Interaural self-motion linear velocity thresholds are shifted by roll vection.

Authors:  Lionel H Zupan; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Scaling of compensatory eye movements during translations: virtual versus real depth.

Authors:  J Dits; W M King; J van der Steen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  Rocking or rolling--perception of ambiguous motion after returning from space.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Scott J Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.