Literature DB >> 8833016

The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer.

N E Alexander1, J Ross, W Sumner, R F Nease, B Littenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To appraise women's perceived risk of developing breast cancer and the effects of a physician's educational intervention on this perception.
DESIGN: Longitudinal before-and-after study involving four measures of participants risk of developing breast cancer. Eligible women provided the data needed to calculate an objective estimate of their individual risk of developing breast cancer before age 80 using the Gail formula. They also provided a subjective estimate of their individual perceived risk. Then, each participant met with a general internal medicine physician who provided personalized information and education. Immediately after education, and again several months later, we reassessed each woman's perceived risk.
SETTING: Physicians office. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 59 women participating in the Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Twenty-nine women returned for the follow-up risk assessment.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The median calculated risk of breast cancer before age 80 (by the Gail formula) was 15%, but the median perceived risk before educational intervention was 50%. The perceived risk after educational intervention fell to 25%. At late follow-up, the median perceived risk remained at 25%. The difference between the preeducational perceptions and the calculated estimates was significant (1) < .0001). After educational intervention, perceived risk measures shifted closer to the calculated value, but still remained significantly higher (p <.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Women often substantially overestimate their chances of getting breast cancer. Educational intervention by a physician, including explanation of an individual's calculated risk, can reduce this error. The effect of education appears to persist at least for several months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8833016     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  19 in total

1.  Risk perception, family history, and use of breast cancer screening tests.

Authors:  A P Polednak; D S Lane; M A Burg
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1991

2.  When numbers get serious.

Authors:  B Littenberg; R F Nease
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.

Authors:  M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1989-12-20       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; A Masny; A Balshem
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.

Authors:  D J Mazur; J F Merz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  K M Kash; J C Holland; M S Halper; D G Miller
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Lerman; M Daly; C Sands; A Balshem; E Lustbader; T Heggan; L Goldstein; J James; P Engstrom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-07-07       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Validation of a breast cancer risk assessment model in women with a positive family history.

Authors:  M L Bondy; E D Lustbader; S Halabi; E Ross; V G Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; L D Burnell; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Why should primary care physicians know about breast cancer genetics?

Authors:  L E Pinsky; J B Culver; J Hull; E Levy-Lahad; M Daly; W Burke
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-09

Review 2.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Impact of Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  The increasing use of prophylactic mastectomy in the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Andrea Abbott; Amanda Arrington; Natasha Rueth
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  A randomized trial of three videos that differ in the framing of information about mammography in women 40 to 49 years old.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Michael P Pignone; Stacey L Sheridan; Stephen M Downs; Linda S Kinsinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

7.  Stability of time trade-off utilities for health states associated with the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Jeffrey Gornbein; Kristen Reid; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Evaluation of group genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yolanda Ridge; Karen Panabaker; Mary McCullum; Cheryl Portigal-Todd; Jenna Scott; Barbara McGillivray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Authors:  Susan L Davids; Marilyn M Schapira; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Bartle-Haring; Paula Toviessi; Heather Katafiasz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.