Literature DB >> 8831540

Trocar site recurrence is unlikely to result from aerosolization of tumor cells.

R L Whelan1, G J Sellers, J D Allendorf, D Laird, M D Bessler, R Nowygrod, M R Treat.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the ability of a high-pressure CO2 environment to aerosolize tumor cells in both in vitro and in vivo models. (An aerosol is defined as a stable gaseous suspension of insoluble particles). Also, this study was designed to determine if rapid desufflation is capable of transporting fluid laden with tumor cells.
METHODS: The four in vitro aerosol experiments were performed in an 18.9-1 plastic vessel fitted with two 7-mm ports and a compliant latex balloon affixed to the top. After CO2 insufflation, the vessel was desufflated through a sterile soluset containing 25 ml of culture media that was subsequently emptied into a culture dish, incubated for two weeks, and periodically assessed for growth. At the bottom of the vessel, one of the following was placed: Study 1 and 2, a suspension of B16 melanoma or colon 26 tumor cells in liquid culture media; Study 3, colon 26 cells in saline solution; Study 4, several pieces of solid colon 26 tumor. In Studies 1 to 3, cell preparations were subjected to the following high-pressure CO2 conditions (pneumo): 1) static pneumo of 15 and 30 mmHg (10 minute dwell); 2) a continuous flow (CF) of CO2 (1O l) while maintaining a pressure of 15 or 30 mmHg in the vessel. In Study 4, only the 30 mmHg static and CF conditions were tested. Between 6 and 12 determinations were performed for each condition and cell preparation. In vivo aerosol experiments consisted of Spraque Dawley rats that received intraperitoneal injections of 10-5 B16 cells in 0.1 ml of liquid media. Two laparoscopic ports were placed in the abdomen, one each for insufflation and desufflation. Study groups were: 1, static CO2 pneumo of 15 mmHg; 2 and 3, continuous CO2 flow (10 l) at a stable pneumo pressure of 5 and 10 mmHg. Desufflation was performed via the same collecting device and handled in an identical manner to the in vitro experiments described above. The in vitro balloon experiment was designed to investigate the ability of desufflation to transport fluid-containing tumor cells; latex balloon model was used. To prevent complete loss of volume on desufflation, a wire coil was placed inside the balloon. Twenty ml of media containing 20 x 10(-6) B16 cells was placed in the bottom of the balloon. The balloon was insufflated with 1 to 2 l of gas. There were three study groups that differed in the degree to which the cell suspension was agitated before desufflation. Study conditions were as follows: 1) no agitation; 2) moderate agitation to coat the lower walls and coil; 3) maximum agitation to coat the entire balloon. To verify the viability of tumor cells, at the end of each in vitro and in vivo study, a sample of tumor cells or peritoneal washing was incubated in sterile media. These samples served as positive controls.
RESULTS: In vitro aerosol studies consisted of the following. At the end of two weeks of incubation, no tumor growth was noted in any of the 124 test dishes. The 14 control samples all demonstrated tumor growth. In vivo aerosol studies consisted of the following. Zero of 18 experimental dishes grew tumor. All three peritoneal washing samples demonstrated growth. In vitro balloon studies consisted of the following. Zero of 12 test dishes in Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated growth, whereas five of six dishes did so in Group 3 (maximally agitated before desufflation). Again, positive controls all grew tumor cells.
SUMMARY: We were unable to demonstrate aerosol formation in any of the in vitro and in vivo studies performed. In the balloon experiment, desufflation-related transport of tumor cells was demonstrated but only when the entire balloon surface was coated with the tumor cell suspension before desufflation.
CONCLUSION: Aerosols of tumor cells are not likely to form. Free intraperitoneal tumor cells are most likely found in liquid suspension. Desufflation is a potential means of transport of cell-laden fluid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831540     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  16 in total

1.  Study on incisional implantation of tumor cells by carbon dioxide pneumo peritoneum in gastric cancer of a murine model.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Min-Hua Zheng; Hao-Bo Zhang; Jian Zhu; Jian-Rong He; Ai-Guo Lu; Yu-Bao Ji; Min-Jun Zhang; Yu Jiang; Bao-Ming Yu; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Enhancement of port site metastasis by hyaluronic acid under CO2 pneumoperitoneum in a murine model.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; Y Hirabayashi; A Shiromizu; N Shiraishi; Y Adachi; S Kitano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Experimental assessment of tumor growth and dissemination of a microscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis after CO2 peritoneal insufflation or laparotomy.

Authors:  E Fondrinier; M Boisdron-Celle; A Chassevent; G Lorimier; E Gamelin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Complications of laparoscopy in benign and oncologic gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Worley; Brian M Slomovitz; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

5.  Detection of aerosolized cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy.

Authors:  S Ikramuddin; J Lucus; E C Ellison; W J Schirmer; W S Melvin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for colorectal cancer: influence on neoplastic cell mobilization.

Authors:  X Bessa; A Castells; A M Lacy; J I Elizalde; S Delgado; L Boix; V Piñol; M Pellisé; J C García-Valdecasas; J M Piqué
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Laparoscopic resection does not adversely affect early survival curves in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E C Poulin; J Mamazza; C M Schlachta; R Grégoire; N Roy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  O Zmora; P Gervaz; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  The pathogenesis of port-site recurrences.

Authors:  M A Reymond; C Schneider; S Kastl; W Hohenberger; F Köckerling
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.