Literature DB >> 10457317

Detection of aerosolized cells during carbon dioxide laparoscopy.

S Ikramuddin1, J Lucus, E C Ellison, W J Schirmer, W S Melvin.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery for malignancy has been complicated by port-site recurrences. The exact mechanism has yet to be defined. In vitro studies suggest that carbon dioxide-induced tumor cell aerosolization may play a role. We have attempted to document this in a human model. Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopy underwent port placement and abdominal insufflation with carbon dioxide. A suction trap was then filled with 40 cc of normal saline solution and attached to an insufflation site on the port. The carbon dioxide effluent was directed through the saline. The specimen was concentrated, resuspended, and transferred to a slide. A Papanicolaou stain was used. Thirty-five specimens were obtained. Fifteen patients (37%) had malignant disease, which was metastatic in eight. Five patients had carcinomatosis. In two of those with carcinomatosis, staining revealed a large number of malignant cells. Malignant cells were not found in any other patients. In two patients, however, aerosolized mesothelial cells were identified. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 7 months. One patient who displayed cellular aerosolization developed a port-site recurrence. We conclude that malignant cells are aerosolized but only during laparoscopy in the presence of carcinomatosis. It is unlikely that tumor cell aerosolization contributes significantly to port-site metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10457317     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80060-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  14 in total

1.  Tumor cell distribution following laparoscopic colectomy in a porcine model.

Authors:  R Allardyce; P Morreau; P Bagshaw
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The movement of mucosal cells of the gallbladder within the peritoneal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Doudle; G King; W M Thomas; P Hewett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of gas(less) laparoscopy and laparotomy on peritoneal tumor growth and abdominal wall metastases.

Authors:  N D Bouvy; R L Marquet; H Jeekel; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Abdominal wall metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  P Jacquet; A M Averbach; N Jacquet
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 5.  Port site metastasis. An unresolved problem in laparoscopic surgery. A review.

Authors:  J Martinez; E M Targarona; C Balagué; M Pera; M Trias
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1995 Oct-Dec

6.  Intraperitoneal cell movement during abdominal carbon dioxide insufflation and laparoscopy. An in vivo model.

Authors:  P J Hewett; W M Thomas; G King; M Eaton
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Trocar site recurrence is unlikely to result from aerosolization of tumor cells.

Authors:  R L Whelan; G J Sellers; J D Allendorf; D Laird; M D Bessler; R Nowygrod; M R Treat
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Inhibition of peritoneal tumor-cell implantation: model for laparoscopic cancer surgery.

Authors:  D S Goldstein; M L Lu; T Hattori; T L Ratliff; K R Loughlin; L R Kavoussi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Proliferative and metastatic potential of exfoliated colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  B Fermor; H C Umpleby; J V Lever; M O Symes; R C Williamson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  H C Umpleby; B Fermor; M O Symes; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  COVID-19 PANDEMIC: IMPACT ON GYNAECOLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY AT THE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL IBADAN.

Authors:  G O Obajimi; O O Lawal; A Adeniyi
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2021-06

Review 4.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancy: forgotten or missed.

Authors:  N Kadi; M Isherwood; M Al-Akraa; S Williams
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04-10

6.  Laparoscopy in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era.

Authors:  Stefano Angioni
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  A knowledge gap unmasked: viral transmission in surgical smoke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Connal Robertson-More; Ted Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Safe Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery during COVID Times.

Authors:  Prakash Harikant Trivedi; Soumil Prakash Trivedi; Nilesh Maruti Ghadge; Dinesh Popatlal Bajani; Aditi Soumil Trivedi
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-12-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.