Literature DB >> 8831379

Myocardial contrast echocardiography: reliable, safe, and efficacious myocardial perfusion assessment after intravenous injections of a new echocardiographic contrast agent.

M Meza1, Y Greener, R Hunt, B Perry, S Revall, W Barbee, J P Murgo, J Cheirif.   

Abstract

Reliable and reproducible myocardial opacification after intravenous administration of echocardiographic contrast agents has remained elusive. This study was performed to determine whether a new agent, FS069, a suspension of perfluoropropane-filled albumin microspheres (3.6 microns average microbubble size, concentration 8 x 8(8)/ml), could achieve safe and successful myocardial opacification in open-chest dogs. Seventeen dogs (group 1, n = 7, group 2, n = 10) underwent two-dimensional echocardiography before, during, and after the administration of intravenous FS069. Safety was evaluated by measuring arterial and pulmonary artery pressures, heart rate, blood gases, systolic function, myocardial blood flow, and postmortem analysis of myocardial viability by triphenyl-tetrazolium chloride staining. Efficacy to detect changes in regional myocardial perfusion was assessed by injecting FS069 at baseline, after sequential coronary occlusions and reperfusion, and during intravenous vasodilators with and without coronary occlusions. Results were compared with radiolabeled microspheres. FS069 was found to be safe and effective. In the absence of coronary occlusions, uniform myocardial opacification was observed in all dogs. A perfusion defect was observed in all dogs during coronary occlusions. Background-subtracted peak contrast intensity in the myocardium correctly identified regional myocardial blood flow changes and showed a significant correlation with radiolabeled microspheres (r = 0.65, p = 0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831379     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90324-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  8 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Safety of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Jarl A Jakobsen; Raymond Oyen; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Contrast echocardiography for right-sided heart conditions: case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Harvinder Arora; Salim S Virani; Leo Simpson; Raymond F Stainback
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

7.  Enhanced methods for visualizing myocardial perfusion with peripheral venous injection of levovist: application of triggered harmonic imaging and triggered harmonic power Doppler imaging techniques.

Authors:  K Hirooka; K Miyatake; A Hanatani; K Komamura; S Nakatani; Y Yasumura; M Yamagishi
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-08

Review 8.  New ultrasound contrast agents for left ventricular and myocardial opacification.

Authors:  J D Kasprzak; F J Ten Cate
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.443

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.