Literature DB >> 10680619

Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

.   

Abstract

There have been long-term efforts to identify a threshold pressure for the onset of inertial cavitation under conditions relevant to ultrasound in medicine. Before the introduction of the output display standard [AIUM/NEMA, 1992a], quantities such as the spatial peak pulse average intensity (I(SPPA)), and, earlier, Im, the spatial peak intensity averaged over the largest half-cycle, were used to give a measure of the potential of a cavitation-based bioeffect due to an acoustic field. Relatively early in the Output Display Standard development effort, the Food and Drug Administration indicated a need for a superior indicator for the potential for cavitation-related bioeffects, initiating a search for such an index. The following paragraphs give an outline of the steps used to develop the Mechanical Index, its relevance as a potential bioeffects indicator, and some information on other exposure parameters involved in bioeffects research.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10680619      PMCID: PMC2000332          DOI: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.2.143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  366 in total

1.  The effects of the microbubble suspension SH U 454 (Echovist) on ultrasound-induced cell lysis in a rotating tube exposure system.

Authors:  A R Williams; G Kubowicz; E Cramer; R Schlief
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.724

2.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  In vitro detection of cavitation induced by a diagnostic ultrasound system.

Authors:  C K Holland; R A Roy; R E Apfel; L A Crum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast angiography in monochorionic twin fetuses.

Authors:  M L Denbow; M J Blomley; D O Cosgrove; N M Fisk
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Sonographic investigation of the uterus during artificial uterine cavity distention.

Authors:  J van Roessel; K Wamsteker; N Exalto
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 0.910

6.  Thresholds for ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in neonatal swine.

Authors:  R Baggs; D P Penney; C Cox; S Z Child; C H Raeman; D Dalecki; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Further evidence of gaseous embolic material in patients with artificial heart valves.

Authors:  D Georgiadis; R W Baumgartner; R Karatschai; A Lindner; H R Zerkowski
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Evidence for ultrasonically induced cavitation in vivo.

Authors:  G R ter Haar; S Daniels
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Successful left ventricular opacification following peripheral venous injection of sonicated contrast agent: an experimental evaluation.

Authors:  M W Keller; S B Feinstein; D D Watson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound with carbon dioxide microbubbles as adjunct to arteriography of liver tumors.

Authors:  A Veltri; S Capello; B Faissola; F Spalluto; S Farinet; M Grosso
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vascular lesions and s-thrombomodulin concentrations from auricular arteries of rabbits infused with microbubble contrast agent and exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Lesions of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage are not consistent with thermal injury.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; Brian J Ricconi; J Gary Eden; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Synergistic effect of ultrasound and PEI on DNA transfection in vitro.

Authors:  Mangesh C Deshpande; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.

Authors:  Erica P McCune; David Q Le; Peter Lindholm; Kathryn R Nightingale; Paul A Dayton; Virginie Papadopoulou
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  In vivo demonstration of ultrasound power delivery to charge implanted medical devices via acute and survival porcine studies.

Authors:  Leon Radziemski; Inder Raj S Makin
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Ultrasound directs a transposase system for durable hepatic gene delivery in mice.

Authors:  Ralph V Shohet; Chad B Walton; Cynthia D Anderson; Johann Urschitz; Mark Khemmani; Jesse B Owens; Stefan Moisyadi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Sonogenetic control of mammalian cells using exogenous Transient Receptor Potential A1 channels.

Authors:  Marc Duque; Corinne A Lee-Kubli; Yusuf Tufail; Uri Magaram; Janki Patel; Ahana Chakraborty; Jose Mendoza Lopez; Eric Edsinger; Aditya Vasan; Rani Shiao; Connor Weiss; James Friend; Sreekanth H Chalasani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.