Literature DB >> 8825134

Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.

P C Stomper1, R B Penetrante, S B Edge, M A Arredondo, L E Blumenson, C C Stewart.   

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate associations among mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue, benign histologic findings, and cellular proliferative activity determined by DNA S phase percentages. Mammographic and histologic findings of benign, normal dense and fatty tissue contained in 100 excised specimens were cross-tabulated with flow cytometric DNA S phase percentages of needle aspirates obtained under radiographic guidance. Histologic evidence of atypia or hyperplasia was present in 21 (32%) of 66 fatty tissue samples and 11 (32%) of 34 dense tissue samples (p = NS). The median S phase percentages were identical for mammographic fatty and dense tissue (median % S phase = 5.35). The frequency of high S phase percentages (above the median) was not significantly different for tissue containing atypia or hyperplasia, 47% (15 of 32), as compared to tissue containing other benign histology, 52% (35 of 68) (p = NS). These frequencies were similar in women 49 and younger or 50 and older. These data show that mammographic normal dense and fatty tissues contain similar frequencies of histologic atypia or hyperplasia and low and high cellular proliferative activity determined by DNA S phase percentages in women aged 49 and younger and 50 and older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8825134     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; J N Wolfe; R N Hoover; L A Brinton; C Schairer; M Salane; M Szklo
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  J Brisson; A S Morrison; D B Kopans; N L Sadowsky; L Kalisher; J A Twaddle; J E Meyer; C I Henschke; P Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns.

Authors:  F de Waard; J J Rombach; H J Collette; B Slotboom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The importance of DNA flow cytometry in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  D J Winchester; R B Duda; C Z August; R A Goldschmidt; D M Wruck; A W Rademaker; D P Winchester; D E Merkel
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-07

5.  Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  D W Hedley; C A Rugg; R D Gelber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination.

Authors:  P C Stomper; S P Cholewinski; R B Penetrante; J P Harlos; T N Tsangaris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The histopathology of mammographic patterns.

Authors:  E R Fisher; A Palekar; W S Kim; C Redmond
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  Flow cytometric DNA analysis of excised breast lesions: use of fresh tissue needle aspirates obtained under guidance with mammography of the specimen.

Authors:  P C Stomper; C C Stewart; R B Penetrante; M E Nava; T N Tsangaris
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  DNA flow cytometric analysis of primary operable breast cancer. Relation of ploidy and S-phase fraction to outcome of patients in NSABP B-04.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Gunduz; J Costantino; E R Fisher; C Redmond; E P Mamounas; R Siderits
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project.

Authors:  J Brisson; A S Morrison; N Khalid
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-12-07       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  7 in total

1.  Aromatase immunoreactivity is increased in mammographically dense regions of the breast.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Hironobu Sasano; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; David A Watson; Carol Reynolds; Wilma L Lingle; Paul E Goss; Rong Li; Sarah E Aiyar; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Richard J Santen; James N Ingle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Reduction in Ki-67 in benign breast tissue of high-risk women with the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglycoside.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Carola M Zalles; Jennifer R Klemp; Brian K Petroff; Qamar J Khan; Priyanka Sharma; Kenneth D R Setchell; Xueheng Zhao; Teresa A Phillips; Trina Metheny; Jennifer R Hughes; Hung-Wen Yeh; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-08-19

3.  Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  No evidence for association of inherited variation in genes involved in mitosis and percent mammographic density.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Jingmei Li; Christopher G Scott; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Xianshu Wang; Jianjun Liu; Zachary S Fredericksen; David N Rider; Fang-Fang Wu; Janet E Olson; Julie M Cunningham; Kristen N Stevens; Thomas A Sellers; Shane V Pankratz; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Dense breast stromal tissue shows greatly increased concentration of breast epithelium but no increase in its proliferative activity.

Authors:  Debra Hawes; Susan Downey; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Sue Bartow; Peggy Wan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Qamar J Khan; Bruce F Kimler; Anne P O'Dea; Carola M Zalles; Priyanka Sharma; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.