Literature DB >> 645642

The histopathology of mammographic patterns.

E R Fisher, A Palekar, W S Kim, C Redmond.   

Abstract

No significant correlation between the types of histologic alteration and various mammographic densities as described by Wolfe was found in specimen mammograms from 50 patients with cancer of the breast and a similar number with fibrocystic disease except for a greater incidence of fibrous mazoplasia in the "highest-risk" densities designated DY. This information is inconsistent with prevailing views that relate such risk for the development of mammary cancer to proliferative fibrocystic disease, vis-à-vis epithelial rather than stromal proliferation. This observation does not necessarily mitigate claims of risk attendant with various mammographic patterns, but indicates the need for further evaluation of this stromal alteration as a discriminant in this regard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 645642     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/69.4.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  7 in total

1.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.

Authors:  P C Stomper; R B Penetrante; S B Edge; M A Arredondo; L E Blumenson; C C Stewart
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  No evidence for association of inherited variation in genes involved in mitosis and percent mammographic density.

Authors:  Celine M Vachon; Jingmei Li; Christopher G Scott; Per Hall; Kamila Czene; Xianshu Wang; Jianjun Liu; Zachary S Fredericksen; David N Rider; Fang-Fang Wu; Janet E Olson; Julie M Cunningham; Kristen N Stevens; Thomas A Sellers; Shane V Pankratz; Fergus J Couch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  The association of histological and radiological indicators of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  S Urbanski; H M Jensen; G Cooke; D McFarlane; P Shannon; V Kruikov; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium.

Authors:  Cecilia W Huo; Grace Chew; Prue Hill; Dexing Huang; Wendy Ingman; Leigh Hodson; Kristy A Brown; Astrid Magenau; Amr H Allam; Ewan McGhee; Paul Timpson; Michael A Henderson; Erik W Thompson; Kara Britt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Mammographic density does not correlate with Ki-67 expression or cytomorphology in benign breast cells obtained by random periareolar fine needle aspiration from women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Qamar J Khan; Bruce F Kimler; Anne P O'Dea; Carola M Zalles; Priyanka Sharma; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Mammographic density and survival in interval breast cancers.

Authors:  Louise Eriksson; Kamila Czene; Lena U Rosenberg; Sven Törnberg; Keith Humphreys; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.466

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.