Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns.

Literature DB >> 6587148

Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns.

F de Waard, J J Rombach, H J Collette, B Slotboom.

Abstract

In a population-based study of 23,511 women 50-67 years of age at the time of first screening, a striking relationship was found between parity and age at first childbirth, on the one hand, and two radiologic aspects of breast parenchymal pattern (dysplasia and prominent duct pattern), on the other. These relationships appeared to be causal.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 1984 PMID： 6587148

Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst ISSN： 0027-8874 Impact factor: 13.506

Keyword Cloud
Cited

15 in total

Review 1. Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors: N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 5.075

2. A comparison of mammographic parenchymal patterns in premenopausal Japanese and British women.

Authors: I H Gravelle; R D Bulbrook; D Y Wang; D Allen; J L Hayward; J C Bulstrode; O Takatani
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 4.872

3. Associations between polymorphisms in glucuronidation and sulfation enzymes and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women in the United States.

Authors: Mellissa Yong; Stephen M Schwartz; Charlotte Atkinson; Karen W Makar; Sushma S Thomas; Katherine M Newton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Victoria L Holt; Wendy M Leisenring; Johanna W Lampe
Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.254

4. Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women on hormonal replacement therapy.

Authors: R C Marugg; M J van der Mooren; J H Hendriks; R Rolland; S H Ruijs
Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 1997 Impact factor: 5.315

5. Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors: Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-02-04 Impact factor: 4.872

Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns.

Review 1. Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

2. A comparison of mammographic parenchymal patterns in premenopausal Japanese and British women.

3. Associations between polymorphisms in glucuronidation and sulfation enzymes and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women in the United States.

4. Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women on hormonal replacement therapy.

5. Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

6. Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.

7. Dietary habits and mammographic patterns in patients with breast cancer.

8. Breast cancer screening, with particular reference to the concept of 'high risk' groups.

9. Hormonal factors in human carcinogenesis.

10. Plasma lipids in premenopausal women with mammographic dysplasia.