Literature DB >> 33953457

Trends in post-heart transplant biopsies for graft rejection versus nonrejection.

Aayla K Jamil1, Aasim Afzal1,2, Tariq Nisar1, Aaron Y Kluger3, Joost Felius2, Detlef Wencker1,2, Shelley A Hall1,2, Parag Kale1,2.   

Abstract

With alternatives such as gene profiling available for surveillance after orthotopic heart transplantation, we sought to evaluate the utilization of endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) for hospitalized patients after heart transplantation. Surveillance EMBs in patients with and without complications were evaluated from the 2004 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample. Over the study period, there was no significant change in the number of EMB procedures performed (P = 0.44). Of 37,955 EMBs, 2283 (6%) were in the setting of graft complications, while 35,672 EMBs were not related to graft complications. EMBs in graft complications did not show a significant increase in length of stay over time (P = 0.06), but had a significant increase in cost over time (P = 0.001). However, those with graft complications had an average of a 5-day longer length of stay (P < 0.001) and costs that were $88,816 (P < 0.001) more expensive compared with those without graft complications. In conclusion, the vast majority of in-hospital EMBs were not related to heart transplantation complications. Nevertheless, EMB hospitalizations with graft complications showed significantly greater length of stay and cost. With the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems more effective to use minimal-contact health surveillance methods rather than invasive EMBs.
Copyright © 2021 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endomyocardial biopsy; national inpatient sample; rejection

Year:  2021        PMID: 33953457      PMCID: PMC8059886          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2021.1873032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  8 in total

1.  Complications of transvenous right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in adult patients with cardiomyopathy: a seven-year survey of 546 consecutive diagnostic procedures in a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  J W Deckers; J M Hare; K L Baughman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Natural course of moderate cardiac allograft rejection (International Society for Heart Transplantation grade 2) early and late after transplantation.

Authors:  H P Brunner-La Rocca; G Sütsch; J Schneider; F Follath; W Kiowski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Current status of endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  Aaron M From; Joseph J Maleszewski; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in heart transplant patients: a retrospective study of 2117 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  F Saraiva; V Matos; L Gonçalves; M Antunes; L A Providência
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Cost-effectiveness of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy after 12 months post-heart transplantation.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Michael A Shullo; Jonathan Holtz; Kenneth J Smith
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  Comparison of Utilization Trends, Indications, and Complications of Endomyocardial Biopsy in Native Versus Donor Hearts (from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002 to 2014).

Authors:  Vikas Singh; Rodrigo Mendirichaga; Ghanshyambhai T Savani; Alex Rodriguez; Vanessa Blumer; Sammy Elmariah; Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje; Igor Palacios
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Endomyocardial biopsy.

Authors:  R E Fowles; J W Mason
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Clinical usefulness of gene-expression profile to rule out acute rejection after heart transplantation: CARGO II.

Authors:  Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Jörg Stypmann; Uwe Schulz; Andreas Zuckermann; Paul Mohacsi; Christoph Bara; Heather Ross; Jayan Parameshwar; Michal Zakliczyński; Roberto Fiocchi; Daniel Hoefer; Monica Colvin; Mario C Deng; Pascal Leprince; Barbara Elashoff; James P Yee; Johan Vanhaecke
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 29.983

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.