OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR). BACKGROUND: ACAR is currently diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy, but CMR may be a noninvasive alternative because of its capacity for regional myocardial structure and function characterization. METHODS: Fifty-eight transplant recipients (mean age 47.0 ± 14.7 years) and 14 control subjects (mean age 47.7 ± 16.7 years) were prospectively recruited from August 2014 to May 2017 and underwent 97 CMR studies (83 transplant recipients, 14 control subjects) for assessment of global left ventricular function and myocardial T2, T1, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). CMR studies were divided into 4 groups on the basis of biopsy grade: control subjects (n = 14), patients with no ACAR (no history of ACAR; n = 36), patients with past ACAR (history of ACAR; n = 24), and ACAR+ patients (active grade ≥1R ACAR; n = 23). RESULTS: Myocardial T2 was significantly higher in patients with past ACAR compared with those with no ACAR (51.0 ± 3.8 ms vs. 49.2 ± 4.0 ms; p = 0.02) and in patients with no ACAR compared with control subjects (49.2 ± 4.0 ms vs. 45.2 ± 2.3 ms; p < 0.01). ACAR+ patients demonstrated increased T2 compared with the no ACAR group (52.4 ± 4.7 ms vs. 49.2 ± 4.0 ms, p < 0.01) but not compared with the past ACAR group. In contrast, ECV was significantly elevated in ACAR+ patients compared with transplant recipients without ACAR regardless of history of ACAR (no ACAR: 31.5 ± 3.9% vs. 26.8 ± 3.3% [p < 0.01]; past ACAR: 31.5 ± 3.9% vs. 26.8 ± 4.0% [p < 0.01]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a combined model of age at CMR, global T2, and global ECV was predictive of ACAR (area under the curve = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CMR-derived myocardial T2 and ECV has potential as a noninvasive tissue biomarker for ACAR. Larger studies during acute ACAR are needed for continued development of multiparametric CMR for transplant recipient surveillance.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of multiparametric cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR). BACKGROUND: ACAR is currently diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy, but CMR may be a noninvasive alternative because of its capacity for regional myocardial structure and function characterization. METHODS: Fifty-eight transplant recipients (mean age 47.0 ± 14.7 years) and 14 control subjects (mean age 47.7 ± 16.7 years) were prospectively recruited from August 2014 to May 2017 and underwent 97 CMR studies (83 transplant recipients, 14 control subjects) for assessment of global left ventricular function and myocardial T2, T1, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV). CMR studies were divided into 4 groups on the basis of biopsy grade: control subjects (n = 14), patients with no ACAR (no history of ACAR; n = 36), patients with past ACAR (history of ACAR; n = 24), and ACAR+ patients (active grade ≥1R ACAR; n = 23). RESULTS: Myocardial T2 was significantly higher in patients with past ACAR compared with those with no ACAR (51.0 ± 3.8 ms vs. 49.2 ± 4.0 ms; p = 0.02) and in patients with no ACAR compared with control subjects (49.2 ± 4.0 ms vs. 45.2 ± 2.3 ms; p < 0.01). ACAR+ patients demonstrated increased T2 compared with the no ACAR group (52.4 ± 4.7 ms vs. 49.2 ± 4.0 ms, p < 0.01) but not compared with the past ACAR group. In contrast, ECV was significantly elevated in ACAR+ patients compared with transplant recipients without ACAR regardless of history of ACAR (no ACAR: 31.5 ± 3.9% vs. 26.8 ± 3.3% [p < 0.01]; past ACAR: 31.5 ± 3.9% vs. 26.8 ± 4.0% [p < 0.01]). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a combined model of age at CMR, global T2, and global ECV was predictive of ACAR (area under the curve = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CMR-derived myocardial T2 and ECV has potential as a noninvasive tissue biomarker for ACAR. Larger studies during acute ACAR are needed for continued development of multiparametric CMR for transplant recipient surveillance.
Authors: P Y Marie; M Angioï; J P Carteaux; J M Escanye; S Mattei; K Tzvetanov; O Claudon; N Hassan; N Danchin; G Karcher; A Bertrand; P M Walker; J P Villemot Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Lars H Lund; Leah B Edwards; Anne I Dipchand; Samuel Goldfarb; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Bronwyn J Levvey; Bruno Meiser; Joseph W Rossano; Roger D Yusen; Josef Stehlik Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-08-21 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Rosario J Perea; Jose T Ortiz-Perez; Manel Sole; M Teresa Cibeira; Teresa M de Caralt; Susanna Prat-Gonzalez; Xavier Bosch; Antonio Berruezo; Marcelo Sanchez; Joan Blade Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2014-11-26
Authors: Ryan S Dolan; Amir A Rahsepar; Julie Blaisdell; Roberto Sarnari; Kambiz Ghafourian; Jane E Wilcox; Sadiya S Khan; Esther E Vorovich; Jonathan D Rich; Clyde W Yancy; Allen S Anderson; James C Carr; Michael Markl Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Brendan L Eck; Scott D Flamm; Deborah H Kwon; W H Wilson Tang; Claudia Prieto Vasquez; Nicole Seiberlich Journal: Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 9.795
Authors: G J H Snel; M van den Boomen; L M Hernandez; C T Nguyen; D E Sosnovik; B K Velthuis; R H J A Slart; R J H Borra; N H J Prakken Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Colin G Stirrat; Shirjel Alam; Thomas J MacGillivray; Calum Gray; Marc Richard Dweck; Victor Jones; William Wallace; John R Payne; Sanjay K Prasad; Roy S Gardner; Mark C Petrie; Saeed Mirsadraee; Peter Henriksen; David E Newby; Scott Semple Journal: Open Heart Date: 2019-10-03