Literature DB >> 8822156

Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis.

P J Hancock1, A M Burton, V Bruce.   

Abstract

Principal components analysis (PCA) of face images is here related to subjects' performance on the same images. In two experiments subjects were shown a set of faces and asked to rate them for distinctiveness. They were subsequently shown a superset of faces and asked to identify those that had appeared originally. Replicating previous work, we found that hits and false positives (FPs) did not correlate: Those faces easy to identify as being "seen" were unrelated to those faces easy to reject as being "unseen." PCA was performed on three data sets: (1) face images with eye position standardized, (2) face images morphed to a standard template to remove shape information, and (3) the shape information from faces only. Analyses based on PCA of shape-free faces gave high predictions of FPs, whereas shape information itself contributed only to hits. Furthermore, whereas FPs were generally predictable from components early in the PCA, hits appeared to be accounted for by later components. We conclude that shape and "texture" (the image-based information remaining after morphing) may be used separately by the human face processing system, and that PCA of images offers a useful tool for understanding this system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8822156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  22 in total

1.  Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces.

Authors:  Charity Brown; Toby J Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

2.  Identification of own-race and other-race faces: implications for the representation of race in face space.

Authors:  Graham Byatt; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

3.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching task.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

Review 4.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

5.  Prime time advertisements: repetition priming from faces seen on subject recruitment posters.

Authors:  V Bruce; D Carson; A M Burton; S Kelly
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-05

6.  The perception of face gender: the role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification.

Authors:  A J O'Toole; K A Deffenbacher; D Valentin; K McKee; D Huff; H Abdi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

7.  Caricature generalization benefits for faces learned with enhanced idiosyncratic shape or texture.

Authors:  Marlena L Itz; Stefan R Schweinberger; Jürgen M Kaufmann
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Temporal Dynamics of the Neural Representation of Social Relationships.

Authors:  Sarah L Dziura; James C Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Task-specific codes for face recognition: how they shape the neural representation of features for detection and individuation.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Diana Omigie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.