Literature DB >> 8821084

Generation effects and the lack thereof: the role of transfer-appropriate processing.

P A de Winstanley1, E L Bjork, R A Bjork.   

Abstract

We report two experiments designed to test a multifactor transfer-appropriate processing explanation of generation effects, and the lack thereof, in free recall and cued recall. The basic argument is that the act of generating a target enhances the processing of one or more possible types of information (e.g. target-specific information, cue-target relationships, or target-target relationships) and that subsequent retention tests will reveal an advantage (or disadvantage) of such generation (compared to a "read" control) to the degree that a test is sensitive to the information on which processing was focused during study. Across the two experiments, manipulations of identical stimulus materials forced subjects to process different types of information in order to generate targets, producing a striking reversal in the relative levels of free recall and cued recall for targets that had been generated vs. read, and lending strong support to the transfer-appropriate processing aspect of the proposed framework for explaining generation effects.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8821084     DOI: 10.1080/741940667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  10 in total

1.  The generation effect: dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-09

2.  Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.

Authors:  Benjamin C Storm; Michelle L Hickman; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Processing strategies and the generation effect: implications for making a better reader.

Authors:  Patricia Ann DeWinstanley; Elizabeth Ligon Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

4.  Generation and mnemonic encoding induce a mirror effect in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Raymond W Guntre; Glen E Bodner; Tanjeem Azad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  Learning how to learn: can experiencing the outcome of different encoding strategies enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Elzabeth Ligon Bjork; Patricia Ann deWinstanley; Benjamin C Storm
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Nate Kornell; Lisa K Son
Journal:  Eur J Cogn Psychol       Date:  2007

7.  Assessing a retrieval account of the generation and perceptual-interference effects.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Daniel Peterson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-12

8.  Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

Review 9.  Examining the relationship between knowing and doing: training for improving food choices.

Authors:  Erica L Wohldmann
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2013

10.  Memory and metamemory for inverted words: illusions of competency and desirable difficulties.

Authors:  Victor W Sungkhasettee; Michael C Friedman; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.