Literature DB >> 8820121

Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide.

A Wennerberg1, T Albrektsson, B Andersson.   

Abstract

The present study compares the bone response to commercially pure titanium screws with two different degrees of surface roughness. Implants blasted with 25- and 250-micron particles of aluminum oxide were placed in rabbit tibiae after the surface roughness of the implants had been measured. After 4 weeks, there was a significantly higher bone-to-metal contact for implants blasted with 25-micron particles compared to those blasted with 250-micron particles. The present study indicates that a highly increased surface roughness compared to a moderately increased one is a short-term disadvantage for bone tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8820121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  24 in total

1.  Surface characterization and biological evaluation of spark-eroded surfaces.

Authors:  A Wennerberg; C Hallgren; C Johansson; T Sawase; J Lausmaa
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Andrea Bagno; Carlo Di Bello
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Grit blasting of medical stainless steel: implications on its corrosion behavior, ion release and biocompatibility.

Authors:  J C Galván; L Saldaña; M Multigner; A Calzado-Martín; M Larrea; C Serra; N Vilaboa; J L González-Carrasco
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Surface modification of titanium implants using bioactive glasses with air abrasion technologies.

Authors:  Garrit Koller; Richard J Cook; Ian D Thompson; Timothy F Watson; Lucy Di Silvio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Laser-treated stainless steel mini-screw implants: 3D surface roughness, bone-implant contact, and fracture resistance analysis.

Authors:  He-Kyong Kang; Tien-Min Chu; Paul Dechow; Kelton Stewart; Hee-Moon Kyung; Sean Shih-Yao Liu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Monika Saini; Yashpal Singh; Pooja Arora; Vipin Arora; Krati Jain
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 7.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Experimental peri-implantitis around titanium implants with a chemically modified surface with a monolayer of multi-phosphonate molecules: a preclinical in vivo investigation.

Authors:  J Sanz-Esporrin; R Di Raimondo; R Pla; F Luengo; F Vignoletti; J Núñez; G J Antonoglou; J Blanco; M Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of a new implant design supporting immediately loaded full arch rehabilitation.

Authors:  Stefano Tetè; Vincenzo Zizzari; Alessandro De Carlo; Bruna Sinjari; Enrico Gherlone
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-08-09

10.  Isolation of osteogenic progenitors from human amniotic fluid using a single step culture protocol.

Authors:  Ivana Antonucci; Irene Iezzi; Elisena Morizio; Filiberto Mastrangelo; Andrea Pantalone; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte; Antonio Gigante; Vincenzo Salini; Giuseppe Calabrese; Stefano Tetè; Giandomenico Palka; Liborio Stuppia
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.