Literature DB >> 8819858

Temporal integration of loudness as a function of level.

M Florentine1, S Buus, T Poulsen.   

Abstract

Temporal integration of loudness for 1-kHz tones and broadband noises was compared over a wide range of levels. Absolute thresholds and levels required to produce equal loudness were measured for 5-, 30-, and 200-ms stimuli using an adaptive, two-interval, two-alternative forced-choice procedure. Levels ranged from 5 to 80 dB SL for noises and from 5 to 90 dB SL for tones. Results for six listeners with normal hearing show that the amount of temporal integration, defined as the level difference between equally loud 5- and 200-ms stimuli, varies nonmonotonically with level. The average amount of temporal integration varies from about 10-12 dB near threshold, to a peak of 18-19 dB when the 5-ms tone is about 56 dB and the 5-ms noise is about 76 dB SPL; the amount of temporal integration decreases to 10 dB for tones and 13 dB for noises with levels around 100 dB SPL. The data for tones are in good agreement with the majority of existing data. The data for noises are within the range of the few previous data, but the effect of level differs from that obtained in previous studies. The present results indicate that the growth of loudness may, at least in part, be consistent with the nonlinear input/output function of the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8819858     DOI: 10.1121/1.415236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating loudness growth from tone-burst evoked responses.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words.

Authors:  Suzanne B Orr; Allen A Montgomery; Eric W Healy; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

5.  Temporal integration of loudness measured using categorical loudness scaling and matching procedures.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Suyash N Joshi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Exploring the source of the mid-level hump for intensity discrimination in quiet and the effects of noise.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Relations among Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Response Measures, Categorical Loudness Judgments, and Their Associated Physical Intensities.

Authors:  Peggy A Korczak; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Monica L Hawley; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

8.  Feasibility of interleaved Bayesian adaptive procedures in estimating the equal-loudness contour.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Celia Zhang; Zhuohuang Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of stimulus duration on audio-visual synchrony perception.

Authors:  I A Kuling; R L J van Eijk; J F Juola; A Kohlrausch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Categorical loudness scaling and equal-loudness contours in listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Andrea C Trevino; Jessa N Gombert; Lauren Liebig-Trehearn; Judy G Kopun; Walt Jesteadt; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.