Literature DB >> 21110606

Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words.

Suzanne B Orr1, Allen A Montgomery, Eric W Healy, Judy R Dubno.   

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that speech loudness is determined primarily by the vowel in consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) monosyllabic words, and that consonant intensity has a negligible effect. The current study further examines the unique aspects of speech loudness by manipulating consonant-vowel intensity ratios (CVRs), while holding the vowel constant at a comfortable listening level (70 dB), to determine the extent to which vowels and consonants contribute differentially to the loudness of monosyllabic words with voiced and voiceless consonants. The loudness of words edited to have CVRs ranging from -6 to +6 dB was compared to that of standard words with unaltered CVR by 10 normal-hearing listeners in an adaptive procedure. Loudness and overall level as a function of CVR were compared for four CVC word types: both voiceless consonants modified; only initial voiceless consonants modified; both voiced consonants modified; and only initial voiced consonants modified. Results indicate that the loudness of CVC monosyllabic words is not based strictly on the level of the vowel; rather, the overall level of the word and the level of the vowel contribute approximately equally. In addition to furthering the basic understanding of speech perception, the current results may be of value for the coding of loudness by hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110606      PMCID: PMC3003730          DOI: 10.1121/1.3493426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Effect of adaptive psychophysical procedure on loudness matches.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Mary Florentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; R A Prosek; B E Walden; M T Cord
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1987

3.  Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses.

Authors:  W V Summers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustic level and vocal effort as cues for the loudness of speech.

Authors:  G D Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Loudness judgments of speech and nonspeech stimuli.

Authors:  M I Mendel; H M Sussman; R M Merson; M A Naeser; F D Minifie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Peak intraoral air pressures during speech.

Authors:  H J Arkebauer; T J Hixon; J C Hardy
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-06

8.  Forward and backward masking: interactions and additivity.

Authors:  R H Wilson; R Carhart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production.

Authors:  P A Luce; J Charles-Luce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The interactions of amplitude and phonetic quality in esophageal speech.

Authors:  G W Blood
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Object-based attention modulates the discrimination of level increments in stop-consonant noise bursts.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Jeremiah Hilton; Shaoxuan Guo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.