Literature DB >> 8815039

Influence of auditory precuing on automatic postural responses.

J W McChesney1, H Sveistrup, M H Woollacott.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the influence of auditory precuing on posture control. Specifically, the influence of a warning signal on the onset latencies of the gastrocnemius (G) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles was determined. An audible 50-ms tone was presented to subjects standing on a moveable platform and preceded a perturbation to standing balance by 500 ms. The perturbations were produced by an anterior or posterior translation (3 cm at 30 cm/s) of the support surface. Unilateral electromyographic activity was recorded from G and TA muscles. In the first series of trials (series A), the muscle onset latencies following perturbations with a nondirectionally specific precue, an invalid precue, and no precue were compared. In the second series of trials (series B), muscle onset latencies following perturbations with a directionally specific precue, invalid precue, and no precue perturbations were compared. In series A, mean muscle onset latencies decreased following nondirectionally specific precues during forward and backward platform perturbations; respectively, TA 6% (91 +/- 9 ms to 86 +/- 9 ms) and G 7% (93 +/- 6 ms to 87 +/- 5 ms). During series B, the TA and G muscle onset latencies decreased following directionally specific precues by 10.4% (92 +/- 12 ms to 82 +/- 6 ms) and 9.8% (92 +/- 9 ms to 83 +/- 6 ms), respectively. There were no significant differences between the types of precues. Thus, prior knowledge of a forthcoming balance perturbation reduces postural muscle onset latency times. In addition, specific prior knowledge reduces muscle onset latency time in the same manner as does nonspecific prior knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8815039     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Reaction time and EEG activation under alerted and nonalerted conditions.

Authors:  R W LANSING; E SCHWARTZ; D B LINDSLEY
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

2.  Preprogramming, programming and reprogramming of aimed hand movements as a function of age.

Authors:  D D Larish; G E Stelmach
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.

Authors:  G D Logan
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1992

4.  On the selection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; R Klein; J Summers; S Buggie
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-03

5.  Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations.

Authors:  F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Postural responses to changing task conditions.

Authors:  P D Hansen; M H Woollacott; B Debu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Inhibition of the achilles tendon reflex by antagonist long-latency postural responses in humans.

Authors:  M H Woollacott; L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Aging and posture control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination.

Authors:  M H Woollacott; A Shumway-Cook; L M Nashner
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  1986

10.  Human automatic postural responses: responses to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions.

Authors:  S P Moore; D S Rushmer; S L Windus; L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Postural prioritization defines the interaction between a reaction time task and postural perturbations.

Authors:  Martijn L T M Müller; Mark S Redfern; J Richard Jennings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of expectation on postural disturbance evoked by proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Fréderic Boy; Nicolas Forestier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cognition and balance control: does processing of explicit contextual cues of impending perturbations modulate automatic postural responses?

Authors:  Daniel Boari Coelho; Luis Augusto Teixeira
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Automated postural responses are modified in a functional manner by instruction.

Authors:  Vivian Weerdesteyn; Andrew C Laing; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The Effects of Temporal and Spatial Predictions on Stretch Reflexes of Ankle Flexor and Extensor Muscles While Standing.

Authors:  Kimiya Fujio; Hiroki Obata; Noritaka Kawashima; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.