Literature DB >> 3224672

Postural responses to changing task conditions.

P D Hansen1, M H Woollacott, B Debu.   

Abstract

The experimental goal was to investigate discrepancies in the literature concerning postural adaptation and to determine if the prior presentation of horizontal perturbations affected the amplitude of responses to rotational perturbations. Surface EMG recordings from lower leg muscles (gastrocnemius (GAS) and tibialis anterior (TA)) were recorded in twelve subjects, and the amplitudes of the responses were statistically analyzed. We did not find differences between the responses to rotational perturbations which preceded or followed horizontal perturbations. This finding did not support the hypothesis that differences in the order of presentation of the different types of perturbations accounted for the discrepancies in the literature. Furthermore, our design did not show the progressive elimination of the GAS response within three to five sequential trials. Instead, we found a slow but significant response amplitude reduction over ten trials without yielding a permanent disappearance of the response. When analyzing the GAS responses to the rotational perturbations only, we found two components that contributed to the response reduction: 1) an initial reduction between trials one and subsequent trials, which could be due to habituation of a startle-like response; and 2) a second reduction which was more gradual. Our results also showed an immediate change in the response amplitude on the first trial, when the type of perturbation was changed. This is inconsistent with the view that ankle musculature stretch and joint movement are the primary inputs driving the postural responses. Since small ankle dorsiflexing rotations produced by the platform translations caused large GAS responses while large ankle dorsiflexing rotations produced by direct platform rotations caused small GAS responses, this suggests that multiple sensory inputs contribute to the responses. We propose that an initial compensation to a new perturbation type occurs within the first trial by the integration of these divergent sensory inputs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3224672     DOI: 10.1007/bf00406622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Medium- and long-latency responses to displacements of the ankle joint in patients with spinal and central lesions.

Authors:  H C Diener; H Ackermann; J Dichgans; B Guschlbauer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

2.  Postural coactivation and adaptation in the sway stabilizing responses of normals and patients with bilateral vestibular deficit.

Authors:  E A Keshner; J H Allum; C R Pfaltz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A model describing vestibular detection of body sway motion.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; B Guschlbauer; H Mau
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-03-26       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Long-latency automatic responses to muscle stretch in man: origin and function.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Rothwell; B L Day
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983

6.  Early stabilization of human posture after a sudden disturbance: influence of rate and amplitude of displacement.

Authors:  H C Diener; J Dichgans; F Bootz; M Bacher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits.

Authors:  L M Nashner; F O Black; C Wall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Variability of postural "reflexes" in humans.

Authors:  H C Diener; F Bootz; J Dichgans; W Bruzek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  14 in total

1.  Postural adaptations to repeated optic flow stimulation in older adults.

Authors:  Kathryn W O'Connor; Patrick J Loughlin; Mark S Redfern; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  A feedback model explains the differential scaling of human postural responses to perturbation acceleration and velocity.

Authors:  Torrence D J Welch; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Intensity and generalization of treadmill slip training: High or low, progressive increase or decrease?

Authors:  Xuan Liu; Tanvi Bhatt; Yi-Chung Clive Pai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Influence of auditory precuing on automatic postural responses.

Authors:  J W McChesney; H Sveistrup; M H Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural responses to changing task conditions in patients with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  P Mummel; D Timmann; U W Krause; D Boering; A F Thilmann; H C Diener; F B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Modification of postural response caused by footwear conditions.

Authors:  H Maejima; C Kamoda; K Takayanagi; M Hosoda; R Kobayashi; A Minematsu; H Sasaki; Y Matsuda; Y Tanaka; A Matsuo; N Kanemura; T Ueda; O Yoshimura
Journal:  J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc       Date:  2000

7.  Kinematics and postural muscular activity during continuous oscillating platform movement in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Richard S Mills; Heidi Sveistrup
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Attenuation of human neck muscle activity following repeated imposed trunk-forward linear acceleration.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Martin Descarreaux; Ariane Bélanger-Gravel; Martin Simoneau; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Different activations of the soleus and gastrocnemii muscles in response to various types of stance perturbation in man.

Authors:  A Nardone; T Corrà; M Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural motor learning in people with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Bauke W Dijkstra; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.