Literature DB >> 17703285

Influence of expectation on postural disturbance evoked by proprioceptive stimulation.

Sébastien Caudron1, Fréderic Boy, Nicolas Forestier, Michel Guerraz.   

Abstract

Recent experiments have shown that the vestibular channel of balance control differs fundamentally from the visual channel. Whereas the response to a visual perturbation can be suppressed if the subject has awareness that an upcoming disturbance is likely to be caused by an external agent rather than by self-motion, a similar assumption cannot be made concerning the vestibular system. The present experiment investigated whether postural responses evoked by a proprioceptive perturbation (vibration of the Achilles' tendon at 90 Hz for 2.2 s) are either automatic and immune to expectation (similarly to vestibular responses) or cognitively penetrable (similarly to visual responses). Subjects (n = 12) stood on a force platform while stimuli were delivered either by the subject himself (self-triggered condition) or by the experimenter. For the latter condition, the stimulus was delivered either without warning (unpredictable condition) or at a fixed interval (500 ms) following an auditory cue (precue condition). Results showed that the backward CoP displacement induced by vibration was delayed by approximately 500 ms in the expected and self-triggered conditions compared to the unexpected condition. However, once initiated, the velocity of the backward displacement was higher in the self-triggered condition as compared to the unexpected condition. After a period of 2.2 s of vibration, the amplitude of this backward CoP displacement was similar in the three experimental conditions. Therefore, although expectation appears to delay the upcoming of the main backward body sway, it does not appear to be able to weight the impact of the proprioceptive stimulation. This suggested that afferents provided by the different sensory channels involved in postural control are not similarly susceptible to high level processes such as expectation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17703285     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1079-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  43 in total

1.  Postural control: visual and cognitive manipulations.

Authors:  M C Hunter; M A Hoffman
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Effects of a reaction time task on postural control in humans.

Authors:  N Vuillerme; V Nougier; N Teasdale
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Influence of auditory precuing on automatic postural responses.

Authors:  J W McChesney; H Sveistrup; M H Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptation to suppression of visual information during catching.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Influence of expectation and arousal on center-of-pressure responses to transient postural perturbations.

Authors:  B E Maki; R S Whitelaw
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Postural control as a function of self- and object-motion perception.

Authors:  Paulo B Freitas Júnior; José A Barela
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance: patients with vestibular deficits.

Authors:  L M Nashner; F O Black; C Wall
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Posture and mental task performance when viewing a moving visual field.

Authors:  Tanja Ehrenfried; Michel Guerraz; Kai V Thilo; Lucy Yardley; Michael A Gresty
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

10.  Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control.

Authors:  M Guerraz; L Yardley; P Bertholon; L Pollak; P Rudge; M A Gresty; A M Bronstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hypnotizability-dependent modulation of postural control: effects of alteration of the visual and leg proprioceptive inputs.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; E Scattina; G Carli; A Macerata; D Manzoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Postural challenge and adaptation to vibration-induced disturbances.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Vincent Nougier; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Postsynaptic nigrostriatal dopamine receptors and their role in movement regulation.

Authors:  Alexei Korchounov; Michael F Meyer; Michael Krasnianski
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Sensory Integration during Vibration of Postural Muscle Tendons When Pointing to a Memorized Target.

Authors:  Normand Teasdale; Mariusz P Furmanek; Mathieu Germain Robitaille; Fabio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Perception of body movement when real and simulated displacements are combined.

Authors:  Sébastien Caudron; Hadrien Ceyte; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Corinne Cian; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceptual assessment of environmental stability modulates postural sway.

Authors:  Natalia Cooper; Iain Cant; Mark D White; Georg F Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.