Literature DB >> 1621884

Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity.

G D Logan1.   

Abstract

The theoretical relation between preattentive processes and automatic processes is different in different approaches to attention and automaticity. In the modal view, automatic and preattentive processes are one and the same; automatic processing is preattentive. In recent views that treat automaticity as a memory phenomenon, automatic processing is postattentive. These views are described and evidence for them is discussed. Two experiments are reported that test whether the training that makes processing automatic also makes it preattentive. The data suggest a dissociation between automatic and preattentive processes that is more consistent with the memory view of automaticity than with the modal view.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1621884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  17 in total

1.  Automatic emotional information processing and the cortisol response to acute psychosocial stress.

Authors:  Mark A Ellenbogen; Robyn J Carson; Rana Pishva
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Alpha-band EEG activity in perceptual learning.

Authors:  Brett C Bays; Kristina M Visscher; Christophe C Le Dantec; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Influence of auditory precuing on automatic postural responses.

Authors:  J W McChesney; H Sveistrup; M H Woollacott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The numerical distance effect is task dependent.

Authors:  Liat Goldfarb; Avishai Henik; Orly Rubinsten; Yafit Bloch-David; Limor Gertner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-11

6.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Maayan Pereg; Yoav Kessler; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Deficits in attentional control: cholinergic mechanisms and circuitry-based treatment approaches.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Giovanna Paolone
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Evidence for attentional processing in spatial localization.

Authors:  Jos J Adam; Eddy J Davelaar; Annoek van der Gouw; Paul Willems
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2007-09-26

10.  A signal detection study of the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Carmel A Levitan; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.