Literature DB >> 10355523

Prism adaptation and aftereffect: specifying the properties of a procedural memory system.

J Fernández-Ruiz1, R Díaz.   

Abstract

Prism adaptation, a form of procedural learning, is a phenomenon in which the motor system adapts to new visuospatial coordinates imposed by prisms that displace the visual field. Once the prisms are withdrawn, the degree and strength of the adaptation can be measured by the spatial deviation of the motor actions in the direction opposite to the visual displacement imposed by the prisms, a phenomenon known as aftereffect. This study was designed to define the variables that affect the acquisition and retention of the aftereffect. Subjects were required to throw balls to a target in front of them before, during, and after lateral displacement of the visual field with prismatic spectacles. The diopters of the prisms and the number of throws were varied among different groups of subjects. The results show that the adaptation process is dependent on the number of interactions between the visual and motor system, and not on the time spent wearing the prisms. The results also show that the magnitude of the aftereffect is highly correlated with the magnitude of the adaptation, regardless of the diopters of the prisms or the number of throws. Finally, the results suggest that persistence of the aftereffect depends on the number of throws after the adaptation is complete. On the basis of these results, we propose that the system underlying this kind of learning stores at least two different parameters, the contents (measured as the magnitude of displacement) and the persistence (measured as the number of throws to return to the baseline) of the learned information.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355523      PMCID: PMC311278     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Mem        ISSN: 1072-0502            Impact factor:   2.460


  20 in total

1.  Allocation of attention and the locus of adaptation to displaced vision.

Authors:  J A Kelso; E Cook; M E Olson; W Epstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; H H Holcomb
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Research on adaptation to rearranged vision: 1966-1974.

Authors:  R B Welch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Prism adaptation: control of intermanual transfer by distribution of practice.

Authors:  E Taub; L A Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision.

Authors:  C S Harris
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Comparison of training methods in the production of prism adaptation.

Authors:  J E Foley; F J Maynes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-07

7.  Plasticity in sensory-motor systems.

Authors:  R Held
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Adaptation to displaced vision: a change in the central control of sensorimotor coordination.

Authors:  M E Hardt; R Held; M J Steinbach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-08

Review 9.  Adaptation to laterally displaced vision: a review.

Authors:  A S Kornheiser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Some critical factors in prism-adaptation.

Authors:  H B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1966-06
View more
  32 in total

1.  Learning motor synergies makes use of information on muscular load.

Authors:  J Fernández-Ruiz; C Hall-Haro; R Díaz; J Mischner; P Vergara; J C Lopez-Garcia
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Environmental experience within and across testing days determines the strength of human visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Semrau; Amy L Daitch; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Emotion and reward are dissociable from error during motor learning.

Authors:  Sara B Festini; Stephanie D Preston; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Sex-related differences in motor learning and performance.

Authors:  Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Rosalinda Díaz; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.759

6.  Acquiring and adapting a novel audiomotor map in human grasping.

Authors:  Daniel Säfström; Benoni B Edin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Rapid topographical plasticity of the visuomotor spatial transformation.

Authors:  Juan Fernandez-Ruiz; Rosalinda Diaz; Pablo Moreno-Briseño; Aurelio Campos-Romo; Rafael Ojeda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 neurodegeneration differentially affects error-based and strategic-based visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Israel Vaca-Palomares; Rosalinda Díaz; Roberto Rodríguez-Labrada; Jacqeline Medrano-Montero; Yaimé Vázquez-Mojena; Luis Velázquez-Pérez; Juan Fernandez-Ruiz
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  How do age and nature of the motor task influence visuomotor adaptation?

Authors:  Samuel T Nemanich; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Long-lasting modifications of saccadic eye movements following adaptation induced in the double-step target paradigm.

Authors:  Nadia Alahyane; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.