Literature DB >> 8800786

Comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative techniques for the assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures.

C Y Wu1, J Li, M Jergas, H K Genant.   

Abstract

To compare visual semiquantitative (SQ) reading and quantitative morphometry (QM) for assessing prevalent and incident vertebral fractures, radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine were evaluated in 400 (only baseline films) and 335 (baseline and follow-up films) postmenopausal women with osteopenia as defined by a T-score of less than 2 SD below young normals. QM was performed using different cutoff thresholds, and the SQ reading was performed by three radiologists independently. A joint consensus reading of the radiographs by all participating radiologists was used as a reference standard. Our results indicate that the concordance within SQ methods is excellent, and it is higher than that between SQ and QM regardless of the cutoff criteria used. This finding was consistent for the diagnosis of prevalent as well as incident vertebral fractures. For prevalent fractures the use of the 2.5 SD cutoff criterion provided the highest concordance with the consensus reading and with the radiologists' reading, thereby providing high sensitivity (70.23%) with moderate specificity (98.76%) relative to the consensus reading when compared with the 3 SD or 4 SD cutoff criteria. For the diagnosis of incident vertebral fractures the best agreement between our consensus reading and QM was found for an absolute reduction of 6 mm and for a combination of relative and absolute reduction of 15% and 3 mm in vertebral height. The respective sensitivities and specificities for the two criteria were 51%/99.9% and 75.4%/98.9%, respectively. Even though the consensus reading may favor the reader's evaluation over QM, the assessment of prevalent and incident fractures using QM alone may not be sufficiently reliable for detection of vertebral fractures in epidemiological studies and clinical trials. It should be performed principally in conjunction with a trained radiologist or a highly experienced clinician.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8800786     DOI: 10.1007/bf01622258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Spine deformity index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  P Sauer; G Leidig; H W Minne; G Duckeck; W Schwarz; L Siromachkostov; R Ziegler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Vertebral fracture or vertebral deformity.

Authors:  M Kleerekoper; D A Nelson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Effect of fluoride treatment on the fracture rate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; S F Hodgson; W M O'Fallon; E Y Chao; H W Wahner; J M Muhs; S L Cedel; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; K Stone; E Hudes; L Palermo; P Steiger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Assessment of osteoporotic spine deformity. A new method.

Authors:  J A Raymakers; J W Kapelle; E C van Beresteijn; S A Duursma
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; Y K Yhee; Y F He; J W Davis; C Kamimoto; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Kyphosis in older women and its relation to back pain, disability and osteopenia: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; L Palermo; M C Nevitt; S Melnikoff; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  42 in total

1.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  An update on the assessment of osteoporosis using radiologic techniques.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Thomas G Maris; Apostolos H Karantanas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The protocol for the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology China Action on Spine and Hip status study.

Authors:  Kai Li; Yong Zhang; Ling Wang; Yang-Yang Duanmu; Wei Tian; Hui Chen; Lu Yin; Jian Bo; Yang Wang; Wei Li; Li He; Wen-Hua Zhao; Shao-Qi Xu; Lin-Fen Zhao; Jun Zhou; Feng-Zhe Wang; Yu Liu; Lei Zhu; Yi-Zhong Chen; Xiao-Lin Zhang; Xiao-Guang Hao; Zhi-Wei Shi; Jun-Ying Wang; Ji-Man Shao; Zhi-Jian Chen; Ren-Sheng Lei; Gang Ning; Qian Zhao; Yong-Hong Jiang; Ya-Hong Zhi; Bao-Qing Li; Xiao Chen; Quan-Yong Xiang; Liang Wang; Yuan-Zheng Ma; Shi-Wei Liu; Xiao-Guang Cheng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-08

Review 4.  [Fracture diagnosis in osteoporosis].

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Observer agreement in pediatric semiquantitative vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; Brian Lentle; Mary Ann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-10

6.  Vertebral Fracture Risk in Diabetic Elderly Men: The MrOS Study.

Authors:  Nicola Napoli; Ann V Schwartz; Anne L Schafer; Eric Vittinghoff; Peggy M Cawthon; Neeta Parimi; Eric Orwoll; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Andrew R Hoffman; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 7.  Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Jiang; R Eastell; N A Barrington; L Ferrar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Number and severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral fractures in Japanese women with osteoporosis: results from the minodronate trial.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Masataka Shiraki; Masao Fukunaga; Tetsuo Nakano; Kunio Takaoka; Yasuo Ohashi; Toshitaka Nakamura; Toshio Matsumoto
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Effect of daily oral minodronate on vertebral fractures in Japanese postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; H Hagino; M Shiraki; M Fukunaga; T Nakano; K Takaoka; H Morii; Y Ohashi; T Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.