Literature DB >> 15071725

Comparison of methods for the visual identification of prevalent vertebral fracture in osteoporosis.

G Jiang1, R Eastell, N A Barrington, L Ferrar.   

Abstract

The identification of vertebral fracture in osteoporosis is based mainly on the identification of abnormal variation in vertebral shape, but this can be misleading in the presence of a non-fracture deformity or normal variant of vertebral shape. Qualitative identification of vertebral fracture (Qual) is influenced by the subjectivity of the approach, and although more objective, the semiquantitative method (SQ) can be difficult to apply. In addition, there has been little independent evaluation of SQ in relation to other approaches. We aimed to evaluate a new algorithm-based approach for the qualitative identification of vertebral fracture (ABQ) and to compare it with SQ and Qual. Two radiologists reported spinal radiographs for 372 postmenopausal women using Qual (reader 1), and SQ and ABQ (reader 2). Non-fracture deformities and normal variants were also reported using Qual and ABQ. The prevalence of vertebral fracture by subjects was higher for SQ (24%) than for Qual (11%) and ABQ (7%). Agreement was poor between SQ and the other methods, and moderate between Qual and ABQ. Twenty-two women with vertebral fracture were agreed by all three methods, similar to the total identified by ABQ (25 women). Seventeen women diagnosed with fracture by Qual, had non-fracture deformity or normal variant (but no fracture) according to ABQ. Of the women with SQ fractures, 53% and 70% were identified negative for fracture but positive for non-fracture deformity or normal variant by ABQ and Qual. The main sources of discrepancy between SQ and the other methods were Scheuermann's disease, normal variation, and degenerative change accompanied by short anterior vertebral height. For all methods, bone mineral density (BMD) and BMD Z-scores were lower in women with vertebral fractures than in those with no fractures. Bone mineral density and BMD Z-scores were also lower at the lumbar spine and total body in women with vertebral fractures according to Qual and ABQ than they were for SQ, and were lower in women with SQ fractures agreed by Qual and ABQ, compared with those diagnosed negative for fracture by Qual and ABQ (p<0.01). We conclude that poor agreement between methods arises mainly from difficulties in differentiating true fracture from non-fracture deformity. Our new approach attempts to address this problem but requires further testing in a larger study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071725     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1626-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  25 in total

1.  Classification of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Eastell; S L Cedel; H W Wahner; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Vertebral fracture or vertebral deformity.

Authors:  M Kleerekoper; D A Nelson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Quantitation of incident spinal fractures: comparison of visual detection with quantitative morphometry.

Authors:  C Y Pak; A Ho; J Poindexter; R Peterson; K Sakhaee
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Densitometric and visual observations of spinal radiographs.

Authors:  L M Hurxthal; G P Vose; W E Dotter
Journal:  Geriatrics       Date:  1969-05

5.  A new approach to defining normal vertebral dimensions.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; K Stone; E Hudes; L Palermo; P Steiger
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Jones; C White; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A new method for vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; Y K Yhee; Y F He; J W Davis; C Kamimoto; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Vertebral morphometry in diagnosis of spinal fractures.

Authors:  L R Hedlund; J C Gallagher
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-10

9.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  91 in total

1.  Vertebral fractures despite normal spine bone mineral density in a boy with nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Marie Sbrocchi; Frank Rauch; MaryAnn Matzinger; Janusz Feber; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  New dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry equipment in the assessment of vertebral fractures: technical limits and software accuracy.

Authors:  Alberto Bazzocchi; Danila Diano; Giuseppe Battista; Ugo Albisinni; Cristina Rossi; Giuseppe Guglielmi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L J Melton; D E Wenger; E J Atkinson; S J Achenbach; T H Berquist; B L Riggs; G Jiang; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Skeletal findings in children recently initiating glucocorticoids for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  J Feber; I Gaboury; A Ni; N Alos; S Arora; L Bell; T Blydt-Hansen; C Clarson; G Filler; J Hay; D Hebert; B Lentle; M Matzinger; J Midgley; D Moher; M Pinsk; F Rauch; C Rodd; N Shenouda; K Siminoski; L M Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Simplified criteria for selecting patients for vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Tamara J Vokes; Siu-Ling Ma; Maureen Costello; Harold R Rosen; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

8.  Prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures in old men and the agreement between different methods in the city of Recife, Brazil.

Authors:  Carla Nubia Borges; Juliana Maia de Almeida; Denise Lima; Marcelo Cabral; Francisco Bandeira
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

10.  Lateral back pain identifies prevalent vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women: cross-sectional analysis of a primary care-based cohort.

Authors:  Emma M Clark; Alison P Hutchinson; Eugene V McCloskey; Mike D Stone; James C Martin; Ashok K Bhalla; Jon H Tobias
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.