Literature DB >> 8798937

Resuscitating the elderly: what do the patients want?

P Bruce-Jones1, H Roberts, L Bowker, V Cooney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the resuscitation preferences, choice of decision-maker, views on the seeking of patients' wishes and determinants of these of elderly hospital in-patients.
DESIGN: Questionnaire administered on admission and prior to discharge.
SETTING: Two acute geriatric medicine units (Southampton and Poole). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and fourteen consecutive consenting mentally competent patients admitted to hospital as emergencies.
RESULTS: Resuscitation was wanted by 60%, particularly married and functionally independent patients and those who had not already considered it. Not wanted resuscitation was associated with lack of social contacts. Sixty-seven per cent welcomed enquiry about their preferences and 78% wanted participation in decision, 43% as sole decision-maker. Wishing to choose oneself was associated with not wanting resuscitation, prior knowledge of it, and lack of a spouse. Patients' opinions remained stable during their admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Discussion of resuscitation is practical on hospital admission without causing distress and the views expressed endure through the period of hospitalisation. Elderly patients' attitudes depend partly on personal health and social circumstances. This may assist doctors when patients are unable to participate themselves.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798937      PMCID: PMC1376979          DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.3.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  25 in total

1.  Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients.

Authors:  David Frankl; Robert K Oye; Paul E Bellamy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Resuscitation in the elderly: a blessing or a curse?

Authors:  P J Podrid
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Life prolongation: views of elderly outpatients and health care professionals.

Authors:  M Kohn; G Menon
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  B Lo; G A McLeod; G Saika
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-08

5.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the aged. A prospective survey.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  How much sense is there in an attempt to resuscitate an aged person?

Authors:  I Füsgen; J D Summa
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 5.140

7.  The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients. A second look.

Authors:  S H Wanzer; D D Federman; S J Adelstein; C K Cassel; E H Cassem; R E Cranford; E W Hook; B Lo; C G Moertel; P Safar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Elderly patients' views on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  N P Gunasekera; D J Tiller; L T Clements; B K Bhattacharya
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the elderly: patients' and relatives' views.

Authors:  G E Mead; C J Turnbull
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Exclusion from resuscitation.

Authors:  R M Keatinge
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  13 in total

1.  Resurrecting autonomy during resuscitation--the concept of professional substituted judgment.

Authors:  M Ardagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  An analysis of CPR decision-making by elderly patients.

Authors:  G M Sayers; I Schofield; M Aziz
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Advance directives and living wills.

Authors:  K Stewart; L Bowker
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.

Authors:  J Richter; M Eisemann; E Zgonnikova
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Catherine L Auriemma; Christina A Nguyen; Rachel Bronheim; Saida Kent; Shrivatsa Nadiger; Dustin Pardo; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Awareness of do-not-resuscitate orders: what do patients know and want?

Authors:  Claire Robinson; Sharlene Kolesar; Mark Boyko; Jonathan Berkowitz; Betty Calam; Marisa Collins
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  A J Rosin; M Sonnenblick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 8.  Resuscitation decisions in the elderly: a discussion of current thinking.

Authors:  P N Bruce-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?

Authors:  E P Cherniack
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.