Literature DB >> 11417027

Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany.

J Richter1, M Eisemann, E Zgonnikova.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study was performed in order to investigate how end-of-life decisions are influenced by cultural and sociopolitical circumstances and to explore the compliance of doctors with patient wishes. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENT: Five hundred and thirty-five physicians were surveyed in Sweden (Umeå), Germany (Rostock and Neubrandenburg), and in Russia (Arkhangelsk) by a questionnaire. The participants were recruited according to availability and are not representative. The questionnaire is based on the one developed by Molloy and co-workers in Canada which contains three case vignettes about an 82-year-old Alzheimer patient with an acute life-threatening condition; the questionnaire includes different levels of information about his treatment wishes. We have added various questions about attitudes determining doctors' decision making process (legal and ethical concerns, patient's and family wishes, hospital costs, patient's age and level of dementia and physician's religion).
RESULTS: Swedish physicians chose fewer life-prolonging interventions as compared with the Russian and the German doctors. Swedish physicians would perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the event of a cardiac arrest less frequently, followed by the German doctors. More than half the Russian physicians decided to perform CPR irrespective of the available information about the patient's wishes. Level of dementia emerged as the most powerful determining attitude-variable for the decision making in all three countries.
CONCLUSIONS: The lack of compliance with patient wishes among a substantial number of doctors points to the necessity of emphasising ethical aspects both in medical education and clinical practice. The inconsistency in the treatment decisions of doctors from different countries calls for social consensus in this matter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11417027      PMCID: PMC1733385          DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.3.186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  33 in total

1.  Two years experience with a comprehensive health care directive in a home for the aged.

Authors:  D William Molloy; Mafalda Urbanyi; John R Horsman; Gordon H Guyatt; Michel Bédard
Journal:  Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can       Date:  1992-12

Review 2.  State statutes limiting advance directives: death warrants or life sentences?

Authors:  M B Kapp
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Withdrawing and withholding life support in geriatric surgical patients. Ethical considerations.

Authors:  W P Schecter
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  The ethics of treatment decision making: the elderly patient's perspective. The vast resources--and costs--of available technology makes it crucial that we understand what the patient wants.

Authors:  W J Pinch; M E Parsons
Journal:  Geriatr Nurs       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.361

5.  Advance directives: can patients' stated treatment choices be used to infer unstated choices?

Authors:  L L Emanuel; M J Barry; E J Emanuel; J D Stoeckle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Variability in physicians' decisions on caring for chronically ill elderly patients: an international study.

Authors:  E Alemayehu; D W Molloy; G H Guyatt; J Singer; G Penington; J Basile; M Eisemann; P Finucane; M E McMurdo; C Powell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  [Decisions and attitudes in treatment of incompetent, chronically ill, aged patients. A comparison between nurses and physicians: why does no one ask the nurse?].

Authors:  J Richter; M Eisemann; B Bauer; H Kreibeck
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.281

8.  Continuing problems with patient self-determination.

Authors:  B D White; P A Singer; M Siegler
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Advance directives: the views of health care professionals.

Authors:  M Kelner; I L Bourgeault; P C Hébert; E V Dunn
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Factors affecting physicians' decisions on caring for an incompetent elderly patient: an international study.

Authors:  D W Molloy; G H Guyatt; E Alemayehu; W McIlroy; A Willan; M Eisemann; G Abraham; J Basile; G Penington; M E McMurdo
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  17 in total

1.  Experiences of non-UK-qualified doctors working within the UK regulatory framework: a qualitative study.

Authors:  A Slowther; G A Lewando Hundt; J Purkis; R Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  What is the role of empirical research in bioethical reflection and decision-making? An ethical analysis.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

3.  End of Life Care for Older Russian Immigrants - Perspectives of Russian Immigrants and Hospice Staff.

Authors:  Emily H Eckemoff; S Sudha; Dan Wang
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2018-09

Review 4.  Withholding, discontinuing and withdrawing medications in dementia patients at the end of life: a neglected problem in the disadvantaged dying?

Authors:  Carole Parsons; Carmel M Hughes; A Peter Passmore; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a mixed intensive care unit: most common in patients with catastropic brain injury.

Authors:  Martijn A Verkade; Jelle L Epker; Mariska D Nieuwenhoff; Jan Bakker; Erwin J O Kompanje
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  Care of terminally-ill patients: an opinion survey among critical care healthcare providers in the Middle East.

Authors:  M ur Rahman; S Abuhasna; F M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  Factors associated with physician decision-making in starting tube feeding.

Authors:  Christina Bell; Emese Somogyi-Zalud; Kamal Masaki; Theresa Fortaleza-Dawson; Patricia Lanoie Blanchette
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Paulo Maia; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Bara Ricou; Apostolos Armaganidis; Mario Baras; Elisabet Wennberg; Konrad Reinhart; Simon L Cohen; Dietmar R Fries; George Nakos; Lambertius G Thijs
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Identifying the components of clinical vignettes describing Alzheimer's disease or other dementias: a scoping review.

Authors:  Harkanwal Randhawa; Aalim Jiwa; Mark Oremus
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Ethical issues in the end of life care for cancer patients in iran.

Authors:  Mina Mobasher; Nouzar Nakhaee; Mamak Tahmasebi; Farzaneh Zahedi; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.