Literature DB >> 3411069

Life prolongation: views of elderly outpatients and health care professionals.

M Kohn1, G Menon.   

Abstract

A peculiar dynamic in communication exists between those who are most likely to be involved in life-prolongation decisions. We found that both the elderly and health care professionals talk about life-prolongation, but not with one another; that they consider some of the same factors as they think about the life-prolongation decision; and that most of them believe physicians should be responsible for initiating discussion. However, the physician or health care professional who wishes to avoid crisis situations also is reluctant to broach the issue for fear of unnecessarily alarming or compromising the defense mechanisms of the patient. The patient remains patient, waiting--with fears of dependency, memories of previous life-threatening experiences, and deep sensitivity for suffering--for the physician to initiate the discussion. Is a mediator such as a family member necessary in these situations? Is the hospital environment not conductive to discussion of less than heroic efforts?

Entities:  

Keywords:  Akron City Hospital; Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411069     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1988.tb04270.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  9 in total

1.  The value of taking an 'ethics history'.

Authors:  G M Sayers; D Barratt; C Gothard; C Onnie; S Perera; D Schulman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Advance directives in family practice.

Authors:  N Kohut; P A Singer
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Decision support for patient preference-based care planning: effects on nursing care and patient outcomes.

Authors:  C M Ruland
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Resuscitation decisions in the elderly: a discussion of current thinking.

Authors:  P N Bruce-Jones
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Promoting advance directives among elderly primary care patients.

Authors:  Lawrence S Wissow; Amy Belote; Wade Kramer; Amy Compton-Phillips; Robert Kritzler; Jonathan P Weiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Age-related differences in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  D A August; T Rea; V K Sondak
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Resuscitating the elderly: what do the patients want?

Authors:  P Bruce-Jones; H Roberts; L Bowker; V Cooney
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Will outpatients complete living wills? A comparison of two interventions.

Authors:  J Hare; C Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Advance directives: from the perspective of the patient and the physician.

Authors:  S C Johnston; S C Johnson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 18.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.