Literature DB >> 8798171

Analysis of noise in phase contrast MR imaging.

A H Andersen1, J E Kirsch.   

Abstract

In this work we analyze the effects of inherent random noise on the detectability of low-contrast vessel structures that possess slow flow. When flow is encoded in more than one direction, the number of independent noise contributions increases in addition to the scan time. In a fast-flow scenario, only the noise contribution from sampling along the direction of flow is of any significance. At slow flow rates, however, it becomes necessary to account for the noise in each encoded Cartesian direction. The degree to which noise affects low-contrast detectability also depends on the method of phase contrast image processing employed. A theoretical analysis of the statistical properties of signal and noise in processed phase contrast magnitude images is presented and verified from experimental MR image data. Results show a progressively increased bias in the processed phase contrast image magnitude at slow flow rates due to contributions from inherent random noise. The amount of this bias increases with the number of physical directions in which flow is encoded and is larger for complex difference processed images than for phase difference processing. Correspondingly, the output signal-to-noise ratio associated with flow is compromised.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798171     DOI: 10.1118/1.597729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Improved image reconstruction of low-resolution multichannel phase contrast angiography.

Authors:  Akshara P Krishnan; Ajin Joy; Joseph Suresh Paul
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-22

2.  Vector-field classification in magnetic-resonance angiography.

Authors:  M A Tovar
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1998

3.  Accelerated phase-contrast cine MRI using k-t SPARSE-SENSE.

Authors:  Daniel Kim; Hadrien A Dyvorne; Ricardo Otazo; Li Feng; Daniel K Sodickson; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Chemical shift-induced phase errors in phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Matthew J Middione; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Virtual injections using 4D flow MRI with displacement corrections and constrained probabilistic streamlines.

Authors:  Grant S Roberts; Michael W Loecher; Alma Spahic; Kevin M Johnson; Patrick A Turski; Laura B Eisenmenger; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MR imaging of apparent 3He gas transport in narrow pipes and rodent airways.

Authors:  Kevin R Minard; Richard E Jacob; Gernot Laicher; Daniel R Einstein; Andrew P Kuprat; Richard A Corley
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-07-13       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Calculating T2 in images from a phased array receiver.

Authors:  Peter A Hardy; Anders H Andersen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Probabilistic Identification and Estimation of Noise (PIESNO): a self-consistent approach and its applications in MRI.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay; Evren Ozarslan; Carlo Pierpaoli
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Quantitative time-of-flight MR angiography for simultaneous luminal and hemodynamic evaluation of the intracranial arteries.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Rong Huang; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Optimized bias and signal inference in diffusion-weighted image analysis (OBSIDIAN).

Authors:  Stefan Kuczera; Mohammad Alipoor; Fredrik Langkilde; Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.