Literature DB >> 8795674

Inhalational drug delivery from seven different spacer devices.

P W Barry1, C O'Callaghan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A study was performed to determine in vitro the difference in drug output of seven currently available spacer devices when used with different inhaled medications.
METHODS: A glass multistage liquid impinger (MSLI) was used to determine the amount of disodium cromoglycate (DSCG, 5 mg), salbutamol (100 micrograms), or budesonide (200 micrograms) obtained in various particle size ranges from metered dose inhalers (MDIs) actuated directly into the MSLI or via one of seven different spacer devices; the Fisonair, Nebuhaler, Volumatic, Inspirease, Aerochamber, Aerosol Cloud Enhancer, and Dynahaler.
RESULTS: In particles smaller than 5 microns in diameter the dose of DSCG recovered from the Fisonair and Nebuhaler was 118% and 124%, respectively, of that recovered using the MDI alone. The dose recovered from the smaller volume spacers was 90% (Inspirease), 36% (Aerochamber), 33% (Aerosol Cloud Enhancer), and 21% (Dynahaler) of that from the MDI alone. The Volumatic increased the amount of salbutamol in particles smaller than 5 microns to 117% of that from the MDI, and the Inspirease and Aerochamber spacers decreased it by nearly 50%. The amount of budesonide in small particles recovered after use of the Nebuhaler, Inspirease, and the Aerochamber was 92%, 101%, and 78%, respectively, of that from the MDI alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the test conditions used, large volume spacers such as the Fisonair, Nebuhaler, and Volumatic delivered significantly more DSCG and salbutamol than the smaller spacers tested. The differences between spacers were less for budesonide than the other medications studied. This study shows that there are significant differences in the amount of drug available for inhalation when different spacers are used as inhalational aids with different drugs. Spacer devices need to be fully evaluated for each drug prescribed for them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8795674      PMCID: PMC472565          DOI: 10.1136/thx.51.8.835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  19 in total

1.  Spacing devices and metered-dose inhalers in childhood asthma.

Authors:  H Levison; P A Reilly; G H Worsley
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Comparison of three techniques of inhalation on the airway response to terbutaline.

Authors:  M J Cushley; R A Lewis; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Optimum use of a spacer device.

Authors:  P W Barry; C F Robertson; C O'Callaghan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Transbronchial needle aspiration. Is it coming of age?

Authors:  P A Kvale
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Influence of different extension-actuator tubes on the bronchodilation effect of a terbutaline sulfate aerosol.

Authors:  J Lulling; J P Delwiche; K G Hidinger; J Prignot
Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis       Date:  1983-01

6.  Improvement of pressurised aerosol deposition with Nebuhaler spacer device.

Authors:  S P Newman; A B Millar; T R Lennard-Jones; F Morén; S W Clarke
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Assessment of a new device for delivering aerosol drugs to asthmatic children.

Authors:  I G Hodges; A D Milner; G M Stokes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Experimental determination of the regional deposition of aerosol particles in the human respiratory tract.

Authors:  W Stahlhofen; J Gebhart; J Heyder
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1980-06

9.  Clinical evaluation of a simple demand inhalation MDI aerosol delivery device.

Authors:  M Dolovich; R Ruffin; D Corr; M T Newhouse
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Assessment of a new device (aerochamber) for use with aerosol drugs in asthmatic children.

Authors:  D Gurwitz; H Levison; C Mindorff; P Reilly; G Worsley
Journal:  Ann Allergy       Date:  1983-03
View more
  22 in total

1.  Randomised controlled study of clinical efficacy of spacer therapy in asthma with regard to electrostatic charge.

Authors:  E Dompeling; A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H M Janssens; W Hop; J G Brinkman; R N Sukhai; J C de Jongste
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Pectus excavatum: studiously ignored in the United Kingdom?

Authors:  R Wheeler; K Foote
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  How to choose delivery devices for asthma.

Authors:  C O'Callaghan; P W Barry
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Lung deposition of aerosol--a comparison of different spacers.

Authors:  H J Zar; E G Weinberg; H J Binns; F Gallie; M D Mann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Inhalation devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Early lung absorption profile of non-CFC salbutamol via small and large volume plastic spacer devices.

Authors:  B J Lipworth; D J Clark
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Tailored education may reduce health literacy disparities in asthma self-management.

Authors:  Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Kristin A Riekert; Andrew Bilderback; Arjun Chanmugam; Peter Hill; Cynthia S Rand; Fred L Brancati; Jerry A Krishnan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Iloprost-containing liposomes for aerosol application in pulmonary arterial hypertension: formulation aspects and stability.

Authors:  Elke Kleemann; Thomas Schmehl; Tobias Gessler; Udo Bakowsky; Thomas Kissel; Werner Seeger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Respirable dose delivery of fluticasone propionate from a small valved holding chamber, a compact breath actuated integrated vortex device and a metered dose inhaler.

Authors:  Arun Nair; Daniel Menzies; Martyn Barnes; Patricia Burns; Lesley McFarlane; Brian J Lipworth
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.