Literature DB >> 18813895

Midterm to long-term followup of staged reimplantation for infected hip arthroplasty.

Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo1, Daniel J Berry, Arlen D Hanssen, Miguel E Cabanela.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Most reports on two-stage reimplantation have focused on the short-term cure rate of infection, but little is known about long-term reinfection-free survival or mechanical durability. We retrospectively reviewed 168 patients (169 hips) with infected arthroplasty, all of whom had two-stage reimplantation for the treatment of an infected total hip arthroplasty between 1988 and 1998. In the second stage, the femoral component was fixed with antibiotic-loaded bone cement in 121 hips; the remaining femoral components and all acetabular components were uncemented. The minimum followup time was 2 years (mean, 7 years; range, 2-16 years). At most recent followup, 12 hips (7.1%) were reoperated on for reinfection and 13 hips (7.7%) were revised for aseptic loosening or osteolysis. Apparently aseptic loosening occurred on one or both sides of the joint in 24 hips (14.2%). The 10-year survivals free of reinfection and mechanical failure were 87.5% and 75.2% respectively. Nineteen hips dislocated and eight underwent revision surgery for instability. The method of femoral component fixation, either with or without cement, did not correlate with risk of infection, loosening, or mechanical failure. Based on these results, the method of fixation used for the femoral component during two-stage reimplantation surgery should be based on the surgeon's preference for fixation combined with the assessment of femoral bone stock. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813895      PMCID: PMC2600996          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0480-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

1.  Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; N V Greidanus; J Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  A D Hanssen; J A Rand
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

3.  Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Charles M Davis; Daniel J Berry; William S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Cemented revision hip arthroplasty. A multicenter 5-9-year study of 204 first revisions for loosening.

Authors:  C N Strömberg; P Herberts; B Palmertz
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-04

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  The role of antibiotic-loaded cement in the treatment of an infection after a hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

7.  Surgical treatment of the infected hip implant. Two-stage reimplantation with a one-month interval.

Authors:  R A Colyer; W N Capello
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Treatment of the infected hip replacement.

Authors:  Arlen D Hanssen; Mark J Spangehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two-stage reimplantation protocol.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; G H Callaway; E A Salvati; P M Pellicci; B D Brause
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The use of porous prostheses in delayed reconstruction of total hip replacements that have failed because of infection.

Authors:  B J Nestor; A D Hanssen; R Ferrer-Gonzalez; R H Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  28 in total

1.  Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Jaiben George; Grzegorz Kwiecien; Alison K Klika; Deepak Ramanathan; Thomas W Bauer; Wael K Barsoum; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Retention treatment after periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infection.

Authors:  Ho-Rim Choi; Fabian von Knoch; Abdurrahman O Kandil; David Zurakowski; Slade Moore; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Optimal timing of joint replacement using mathematical programming and stochastic programming models.

Authors:  Baruch Keren; Joseph S Pliskin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2011-07-12

4.  Late Reinfection May Recur More Than 5 Years After Reimplantation of THA and TKA: Analysis of Pathogen Factors.

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Ryan E Miller; Todd M Gilbert; Anthony M White; Elizabeth R Lyden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Partial two-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Timothy E Ekpo; Keith R Berend; Michael J Morris; Joanne B Adams; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Saima Aslam; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Randomized controlled trial of the safety and efficacy of Daptomycin versus standard-of-care therapy for management of patients with osteomyelitis associated with prosthetic devices undergoing two-stage revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ivor Byren; Shruta Rege; Ed Campanaro; Sara Yankelev; Diane Anastasiou; Gennady Kuropatkin; Richard Evans
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Two-stage treatment of hip periprosthetic joint infection is associated with a high rate of infection control but high mortality.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Michael J Morris; Adam G Bergeson; Joanne B Adams; Michael A Sneller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology.

Authors:  P Bejon; A Berendt; B L Atkins; N Green; H Parry; S Masters; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; I Byren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.