Literature DB >> 8779014

Anterior cervical discectomy with or without fusion with acrylate. A randomized trial.

M J van den Bent1, J Oosting, E J Wouda, R E van Acker, B J Ansink, R Braakman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial with assessment of treatment results by an independent observer and by patient questionnaire.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether implantation of polymethylmethacrylate after anterior cervical discectomy improved clinical results and whether polymethylmethacrylate provided a solid bony union with preservation of anatomical relations of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Discectomy without fusion disturbs anatomical relations of the cervical spine. Use of an autologous bone graft frequently causes donor-site complications. Therefore, synthetic materials such as polymethylmethacrylate have been used instead of bone to obtain spinal fusion. Whether these implants improve the clinical results of anterior discectomy is unknown. In addition, the radiological follow-up of discectomy with polymethylmethacrylate has hardly been investigated.
METHODS: Between April, 1986, and April, 1990, all patients with radiologically proven cervical disc pathology and a radicular syndrome were eligible for this study. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical result after 2 years. Assessment of the result was rated both by an independent observer using Odom's criteria and by the patient using a written questionnaire. Before surgery and during follow-up, radiographs were obtained.
RESULTS: Two patients died during follow up. A good result was obtained in 28 of 42 patients (70%) treated with polymethylmethacrylate and in 30 of 39 patients (77%) of patients treated with discectomy only. Pre-operative neck pain subsided earlier if polymethylmethacrylate was used, but the difference was temporary and clinically insignificant. The use of polymethylmethacrylate resulted in a significant lower bony union rate. Polymethylmethacrylate frequently migrated into adjacent vertebrae.
CONCLUSIONS: No relevant clinical differences between treatments were found. The radiological results of anterior discectomy with polymethylmethacrylate were inferior to those of discectomy only. Based on these results, the use of polymethylmethacrylate to obtain fusion after anterior discectomy is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8779014     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar intervertebral fusion with artificial bone in place of autologous bone.

Authors:  Weiguo Xu; Anmin Chen; Xu Feng; Weifeng Yin
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2003

2.  [HAC-titanium as an implant for interbody fusion in spinal canal stenosis of the cervical spine. Six-year clinical trial].

Authors:  D Daentzer; S Asamoto; D-K Böker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Anterior cervical spinal fusion with the Intromed ZWE System: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Johannes Schröder; Florian Grosse-Dresselhaus; Christoph Schul; Hansdetlef Wassmann
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Polymethylmethacrylate-assisted ventral discectomy: rate of pseudarthrosis and clinical outcome with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Daniel Koeppen; Wolfgang R Lanksch; Klaus Maier-Hauff; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  The NEtherlands Cervical Kinematics (NECK) trial. Cost-effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation; a double-blind randomised multicenter study.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Anthony M T Chau; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Joachim K Krauss; Dimitris Zevgaridis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Soner Oezdemir; Daniel Koeppen; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.