Literature DB >> 21626128

Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search.

Lynn Huestegge1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Attention is known to serve multiple goals, including the selection of information for further perceptual analysis (selection for perception) and for goal-directed behavior (selection for action). Here, we study the role of overt attention (i.e., eye movements) as a gatekeeper for memorization processes (selection for memorization). Subjects memorized complex multidimensional stimulus displays and subsequently indicated whether a specific (probe) item was present. In Experiment 1 we utilized an incidental learning setting where in the beginning only a subset of display stimuli was relevant, whereas in a transfer block all stimuli were possible probe items. In Experiment 2, we used an explicit learning setting within a between-group design. Response times and gaze patterns indicated that subjects learned to ignore irrelevant stimuli while forming memory representations. The findings suggest that complex feature binding processes in peripheral vision may serve to guide overt selective attention, which eventually contributes to filtering out irrelevant information even in highly complex environments. Gaze patterns suggested that attentional control settings persisted even when they were no longer required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626128     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0345-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  27 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Interactions between attention and working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; E K Vogel; S-H Oh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Feature integration without visual attention: evidence from the correlated flankers task.

Authors:  J Toby Mordkoff; Rose Halterman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

7.  Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceiving real-world scenes.

Authors:  I Biederman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory: Evidence from attentive tracking and visual working memory paradigms.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-06

10.  The functional visual field during picture viewing.

Authors:  W W Nelson; G R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of an Eye-Tracking Linkage Attention Training System on Cognitive Function Compared to Conventional Computerized Cognitive Training System in Patients with Stroke.

Authors:  Sung-Jun Moon; Chan-Hee Park; Sang In Jung; Ja-Won Yu; Eun-Chul Son; Hye Na Lee; Hyeonggi Jeong; Sueun Jang; Eunhee Park; Tae-Du Jung
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.