Literature DB >> 8771296

Classification and staging of terminal cancer patients: rationale and objectives of a multicentre cohort prospective study and methods used. The Italian Co-operative Research Group on Palliative Medicine.

F Toscani1.   

Abstract

The special circumstances surrounding a terminally ill patient require that a classification system for case-mix and staging take quality of life as its main endpoint. From all possible variables relevant to the case-mix description, a small group of variables relating to the functional status, physical symptoms, psychocognitive problems, and financial status have been isolated in order to identify a limited number of groups of patient who differ in terms of quality of life and/or survival throughout the entire period of treatment in a palliative care unit (PCU). The study is still in progress and involves an estimated sample of about 900 terminal cancer patients being cared for in 61 PCUs in Italy. This paper provides information about the rationale and objectives of the study and the methods used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8771296     DOI: 10.1007/bf01769877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  14 in total

1.  Unendurable symptoms as prognostic indicators of impending death in terminal cancer patients.

Authors:  V Ventafridda; C Ripamonti; M Tamburini; R B Cassileth; F De Conno
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Predicting life span for applicants to inpatient hospice.

Authors:  L E Forster; J Lynn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-12

3.  Prediction of life-expectancy in hospice patients: identification of novel prognostic factors.

Authors:  M A Rosenthal; V J Gebski; R F Kefford; R C Stuart-Harris
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Prognostic uncertainty in terminal care: can the Karnofsky index help?

Authors:  C Evans; M McCarthy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-05-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  'Hospice' versus 'hospital' care--re-evaluation after 10 years as seen by surviving spouses.

Authors:  C M Parkes; J Parkes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Accuracy of predictions of survival in later stages of cancer.

Authors:  C M Parkes
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-04-01

Review 7.  The future of prognostic factors in outcome prediction for patients with cancer.

Authors:  L P Fielding; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; L S Freedman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report.

Authors:  E Bruera; K MacMillan; J Hanson; R N MacDonald
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Clinical symptoms and length of survival in patients with terminal cancer.

Authors:  D B Reuben; V Mor; J Hiris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-07

10.  Terminal cancer care and patients' preference for place of death: a prospective study.

Authors:  J Townsend; A O Frank; D Fermont; S Dyer; O Karran; A Walgrove; M Piper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.