Literature DB >> 2748193

The Edmonton staging system for cancer pain: preliminary report.

E Bruera1, K MacMillan, J Hanson, R N MacDonald.   

Abstract

Fifty-six consecutive patients with pain due to cancer were admitted to a prospective study designed to test a clinical staging system for cancer pain. The system classifies patients in stage 1 (good prognosis) to stage 3 (poor prognosis) according to the mechanism of pain, characteristics of pain, previous narcotic exposure, cognitive function, psychological distress, tolerance and past history of drug addiction or alcoholism. During day 1 patients were staged after being seen by one of the investigators. Patients were treated for 21 days, when a final diagnosis of pain control was made. Eighteen of 22 patients in stage 1 achieved good pain control (82%) vs. 2/22 patients in stage 3 (10%; P less than 0.01). Sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of the system were 0.75, 0.86 and 0.80, respectively. We conclude that this is a simple and reliable system for clinical staging that can be used for clinical research and management of patients with cancer pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2748193     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(89)90131-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  37 in total

1.  Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Program: impact on patterns of terminal cancer care.

Authors:  E Bruera; C M Neumann; B Gagnon; C Brenneis; P Kneisler; P Selmser; J Hanson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-10       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Progress in palliative care.

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Breakthrough pain in cancer patients: new therapeutic approaches to an old challenge.

Authors:  S K Reddy; P Nguyen
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 4.  Advanced cancer: aiming for the best in care.

Authors:  I Higginson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1993-06

5.  Cancer pain--progress and ongoing issues in the United States.

Authors:  Shalini Dalal; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 6.  Palliative care in Edmonton.

Authors:  R L Fainsinger
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Successful use of ketamine for intractable cancer pain.

Authors:  Dominique A Lossignol; Myriam Obiols-Portis; Jean-Jacques Body
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Intermittent cancer pain: clinical importance and an updated cancer pain classification.

Authors:  Wael Lasheen; Declan Walsh; Nabeel Sarhill; Mellar Davis
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Predictors of response to palliative care intervention for chronic nausea in advanced cancer outpatients.

Authors:  Wadih Rhondali; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Gary Chisholm; Jeanette Ferrer; Sun Hyun Kim; Jung Hun Kang; Marilene Filbet; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Opioids switching with transdermal systems in chronic cancer pain.

Authors:  C Aurilio; M C Pace; V Pota; P Sansone; M Barbarisi; E Grella; M B Passavanti
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.