Literature DB >> 6709542

'Hospice' versus 'hospital' care--re-evaluation after 10 years as seen by surviving spouses.

C M Parkes, J Parkes.   

Abstract

This study compares terminal cancer care in 1967-69 with care in 1977-79 as evaluated by surviving spouses of patients who died in St Christopher's Hospice and other local hospitals. Patients and their surviving spouses reported less personal distress in both settings in 1977-79 than in 1967-69 and the patients were also thought to have suffered less pain. These differences were found before, during and, in surviving spouses, after the period of terminal care. They were confirmed in subsamples of 30-34 patients matched for age, sex, socio-economic status and duration of terminal period. Improvements may be attributable to the training in terminal care provided by staff of the Hospice since 1967 and augmented in its Study Centre which was opened in 1973. Although pain and distress in the patient is no longer a major problem in either setting, spouses in 1977-79 remain less anxious at St Christopher's Hospice than at other hospitals; they play a larger part in the care of the patient and are in closer contact with staff before and after bereavement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6709542      PMCID: PMC2417716          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.60.700.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of places and policies for terminal care.

Authors:  J Hinton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-01-06       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Terminal care: evaluation of an advisory domiciliary service at St Christopher's Hospice.

Authors:  C M Parkes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Terminal care: evaluation of in-patient service at St Christopher's Hospice. Part I. Views of surviving spouse on effects of the service on the patient.

Authors:  C M Parkes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Terminal care: evaluation of effects on surviving family of care before and after bereavement.

Authors:  J Cameron; C M Parkes
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.401

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Who needs palliative care?

Authors:  I J Higginson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Effectiveness of care for older people: a review.

Authors:  C R Victor; I Higginson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-12

3.  Dying from cancer in community hospitals or a hospice: closest lay carers' perceptions.

Authors:  D A Seamark; S Williams; M Hall; C J Lawrence; J Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Pain relief in active patients with cancer: analgesic drugs are the foundation of management.

Authors:  M Baines
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-07

5.  Classification and staging of terminal cancer patients: rationale and objectives of a multicentre cohort prospective study and methods used. The Italian Co-operative Research Group on Palliative Medicine.

Authors:  F Toscani
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Terminal care in a semi-rural area.

Authors:  E B Herd
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Cancer pain.

Authors:  M J Baines
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Palliative care: views of patients and their families.

Authors:  I Higginson; A Wade; M McCarthy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-08-04

9.  Care of dying patients in hospital.

Authors:  M Mills; H T Davies; W A Macrae
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-03

10.  Hospice: rehabilitation in reverse.

Authors:  Senthilkumar Jeyaraman; Ganesan Kathiresan; Kavitha Gopalsamy
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2010-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.