Literature DB >> 8770255

Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis.

J Link1, J Brossmann, M Grabener, S Mueller-Huelsbeck, J C Steffens, G Brinkmann, M Heller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether spiral CT angiography allows accurate, quantitative evaluation of anatomic abnormalities, including detection of additional lesions, delineation of plaque morphology, and estimation of degree of internal carotid artery stenosis.
METHODS: Spiral CT angiography with a maximum intensity projection technique was compared with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in 92 carotid arteries. The category of stenosis was determined according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: mild (0% to 29%), moderate (30% to 69%), severe (70% to 99%), and occlusion (100%).
RESULTS: In 78 (85%) of the 92 cases, spiral CT angiography and selective DSA demonstrated the same degree of stenosis. All occlusions (n = 19) were diagnosed correctly with spiral CT angiography. Spiral CT angiography agreed with selective DSA in the classification of stenosis in 59% of the group with mild stenosis, in 82% of the group with moderate stenosis, and in 90% of the group with severe stenosis. In the groups with mild (n = 13), moderate (n = 9), and severe (n = 27) stenosis, correlation of spiral CT angiography with selective DSA was significant. Calcified plaques were readily diagnosed with the use of spiral CT angiography but delineation of ulcers was poor. Tandem lesions were not visible owing to the limited coverage.
CONCLUSION: Spiral CT angiography is useful for the detection of proximal internal carotid stenoses that are greater than 30%. Depiction of mild stenoses appears to be limited. CT is superior for the detection of calcified plaques but it is not useful for the detection of ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8770255      PMCID: PMC8337949     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  15 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Juan Alvarez-Linera; Julián Benito-León; José Escribano; Jorge Campollo; Ricardo Gesto
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography.

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Javier M Romero; Daniel N F Goodman; Ranjit Bagga; H Young Kwon Kim; Neil A Clerk; Robert H Ackerman; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Ingitha Borisch; Markus Horn; Bernhard Butz; Niels Zorger; Bogdan Draganski; Thilo Hoelscher; Ulrich Bogdahn; Johann Link
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography.

Authors:  L Saba; G Caddeo; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Ken Ono; Masafumi Nagano; Kousei Maruoka; Shozaburo Uemura; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Guidelines for the use of carotid endarterectomy: current recommendations from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society.

Authors:  J M Findlay; W S Tucker; G G Ferguson; R O Holness; M C Wallace; J H Wong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  S G Patel; D A Collie; J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; A R Wright; R J Gibson; R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Effect of region-of-interest placement in bolus tracking cerebral computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Raymond Y Huang; Bob B Chai; Thomas C Lee
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Efficacy and sensitivity of axial scans and different reconstruction methods in the study of the ulcerated carotid plaque using multidetector-row CT angiography: comparison with surgical results.

Authors:  L Saba; G Caddeo; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Multidetector-row CT angiography in the study of atherosclerotic carotid arteries.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Roberto Sanfilippo; Raimondo Pirisi; Luigi Pascalis; Roberto Montisci; Giorgio Mallarini
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.