Literature DB >> 17569958

CT and ultrasound in the study of ulcerated carotid plaque compared with surgical results: potentialities and advantages of multidetector row CT angiography.

L Saba1, G Caddeo, R Sanfilippo, R Montisci, G Mallarini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ulceration is a severe complication of carotid plaque. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role and the diagnostic efficacy of multidetector row CT angiography (MDCTA) and ultrasound (US) echo color Doppler (US-ECD) in the study of patients with carotid plaque complicated by ulceration through the comparison with the surgical observation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to October 2005, 237 patients, for a total of 474 carotid arteries, studied at first with color Doppler US, were analyzed using CT angiography. A total of 103 patients underwent a carotid endarterectomy. We analyzed stenosis degree, plaque composition, and presence of ulcerations. In a second phase, the data were compared with the surgical results when the MDCTA indicated surgical intervention.
RESULTS: MDCTA found 31 ulcerations; the surgical confirmation underlined a 93.75% sensitivity and a 98.59% specificity. US-ECD performances were 37.5% and 91.5% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The number of patients who showed plaque ulcerations increased with the severity of stenosis. Furthermore, ulcerations of the carotid plaque occurred more often proximal than distal to the point of maximum stenosis, and this trend increased with the severity of the stenosis. We also determined that fatty plaques were more likely to be affected by ulcerations.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that MDCTA detects with higher sensitivity and specificity the presence of ulcerated plaque compared with US-ECD, which has been demonstrated to be less effective in this evaluation. Considering the high MDCTA sensitivity and specificity for detection of plaque ulceration, we therefore recommend MDCTA as a useful step for correct presurgical planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17569958      PMCID: PMC8134149          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  45 in total

1.  Improved imaging of carotid artery bifurcation using helical computed tomographic angiography.

Authors:  M E Cinat; H Pham; D Vo; I Gordon; S E Wilson
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 2.  Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Hideki Ota; Kei Takase; Hiroya Rikimaru; Masahiro Tsuboi; Takayuki Yamada; Akihiro Sato; Shuichi Higano; Tadashi Ishibashi; Shoki Takahashi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Marja Berg; Zishu Zhang; Aki Ikonen; Petri Sipola; Reetta Kälviäinen; Hannu Manninen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Low-grade carotid stenosis: looking beyond the lumen with MRI.

Authors:  Bruce A Wasserman; Robert J Wityk; Hugh H Trout; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; R N Rankin; A J Fox; R B Haynes; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration. Comparison with surgical observations in a multicenter study. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  J Y Streifler; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; O R Benavente; V C Hachinski; G G Ferguson; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography.

Authors:  M J Cumming; I M Morrow
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-05-10       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators.

Authors:  H J Barnett; D W Taylor; M Eliasziw; A J Fox; G G Ferguson; R B Haynes; R N Rankin; G P Clagett; V C Hachinski; D L Sackett; K E Thorpe; H E Meldrum; J D Spence
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  38 in total

1.  Carotid artery wall thickness measured using CT: inter- and intraobserver agreement analysis.

Authors:  L Saba; R Sanfilippo; R Montisci; J S Suri; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  CTA for screening of complicated atherosclerotic carotid plaque--American Heart Association type VI lesions as defined by MRI.

Authors:  M Trelles; K M Eberhardt; M Buchholz; A Schindler; A Bayer-Karpinska; M Dichgans; M F Reiser; K Nikolaou; T Saam
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.

Authors:  M Anzidei; A Napoli; F Zaccagna; P Di Paolo; L Saba; B Cavallo Marincola; C Zini; G Cartocci; L Di Mare; C Catalano; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Evaluation of distal turbulence intensity for the detection of both plaque ulceration and stenosis grade in the carotid bifurcation using clinical Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Emily Y Wong; Hristo N Nikolov; Richard N Rankin; David W Holdsworth; Tamie L Poepping
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Aortic arch and common carotid artery plaques with soft components pose a substantial risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting.

Authors:  Péter Szikra; Krisztina Boda; Ferenc Rarosi; Attila Thury; Pál Barzó; Tamás Németh; Erika Vörös
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Comparison of carotid plaque ulcer detection using contrast-enhanced and time-of-flight MRA techniques.

Authors:  M Etesami; Y Hoi; D A Steinman; S K Gujar; A E Nidecker; B C Astor; A Portanova; Y Qiao; W M A Abdalla; B A Wasserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  Multi-modal CT scanning in the evaluation of cerebrovascular disease patients.

Authors:  Luca Saba; Michele Anzidei; Mario Piga; Federica Ciolina; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Catalano; Jasjit S Suri; Eytan Raz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Current status of carotid ultrasound in atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Stella Sin Yee Ho
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  Carotid plaque enhancement and symptom correlations: an evaluation by using multidetector row CT angiography.

Authors:  L Saba; G Mallarini
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  The added value of longitudinal black-blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography in the cross sectional identification of carotid atherosclerotic ulceration.

Authors:  Wei Yu; Hunter R Underhill; Marina S Ferguson; Daniel S Hippe; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.