Literature DB >> 9307551

Guidelines for the use of carotid endarterectomy: current recommendations from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society.

J M Findlay1, W S Tucker, G G Ferguson, R O Holness, M C Wallace, J H Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop guidelines on the suitability of patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). OPTIONS: For atherosclerotic carotid stenosis that has resulted in retinal or cerebral ischemia: antiplatelet drugs or CEA. For asymptomatic carotid stenosis: CEA or no surgery. OUTCOMES: Risk of stroke and death. EVIDENCE: Trials comparing CEA with nonsurgical management of carotid stenosis. VALUES: Greatest weight was given to findings that were highly significant both statistically and clinically. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Benefit: reduction in the risk of stroke. Major harms: iatrogenic stroke, cardiac complications and death secondary to surgical manipulations of the artery or the systemic stress of surgery. Costs were not considered. RECOMMENDATIONS: CEA is clearly recommended for patients with surgically accessible internal carotid artery (ICA) stenoses equal to or greater than 70% of the more distal, normal ICA lumen diameter, providing: (1) the stenosis is symptomatic, causing transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke (including retinal infarction); (2) there is no worse distal, ipsilateral, carotid distribution arterial disease; (3) the patient is in stable medical condition; and (4) the rates of major surgical complications (stroke and death) among patients of the treating surgeon are less than 6%. Surgery is not recommended for asymptomatic stenoses of less than 60%. Symptomatic stenoses of less than 70% and asymptomatic stenoses of greater than 60% are uncertain indications. For these indications, consideration should be given to (1) patient presentation, age and medical condition; (2) plaque characteristics such as degree of narrowing, the presence of ulceration and any documented worsening of the plaque over time; (3) other cerebral arterial stenoses or occlusions, or cerebral infarcts identified through neuroimaging; and (4) surgical complication rates at the institution. CEA should not be considered for asymptomatic stenoses unless the combined stroke and death rate among patients of the surgeon is less than 3%. VALIDATION: These guidelines generally agree with position statements prepared by other organizations in recent years, and with a January 1995 consensus statement by a group of experts assembled by the American Heart Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9307551      PMCID: PMC1228103     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  35 in total

1.  Ulceration and carotid artery disease.

Authors:  L R Wechsler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 2.  Carotid endarterectomy: does it work?

Authors:  C Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Carotid endarterectomy--an expression of concern.

Authors:  H J Barnett; F Plum; J N Walton
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Regional performance of carotid endarterectomy. Appropriateness, outcomes, and risk factors for complications.

Authors:  J H Wong; J M Findlay; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Carotid endarterectomy after recent stroke: preliminary observations in patients undergoing early operation.

Authors:  M B Pritz
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis.

Authors:  A Autret; L Pourcelot; D Saudeau; C Marchal; P Bertrand; S de Boisvilliers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-04-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Management of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.

Authors:  N A Martin; M N Hadley; R F Spetzler; L P Carter
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Early carotid endarterectomy after cerebral infarction.

Authors:  J R Little; N A Moufarrij; A J Furlan
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Natural history of asymptomatic extracranial arterial disease. Results of a long-term prospective study.

Authors:  M Hennerici; H B Hülsbömer; H Hefter; D Lammerts; W Rautenberg
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Natural history of nonstenotic, asymptomatic ulcerative lesions of the carotid artery.

Authors:  W S Moore; C Boren; J M Malone; A J Roon; R Eisenberg; J Goldstone; R Mani
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1978-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Variations in rates of appropriate and inappropriate carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention in 4 Canadian provinces.

Authors:  James Kennedy; Hude Quan; William A Ghali; Thomas E Feasby
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to use a decision analysis.

Authors:  Tara M Mastracci; Achilleas Thoma; Forough Farrokhyar; Ved R Tandan; Claudio S Cinà
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Current and future concepts in stroke prevention.

Authors:  Fintan O'Rourke; Naeem Dean; Naveed Akhtar; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-30       Impact factor: 8.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.