Literature DB >> 33779981

Sequential osseointegration from osseohealing to osseoremodeling - Histomorphological comparison of novel 3D porous and solid Ti-6Al-4V titanium implants.

Alice Frosch1, Sebastian Krohn2, Gottfried Buchhorn1, Wolfgang Lehmann1, Karl-Heinz Frosch3, László Füzesi4, Stephan Frosch5.   

Abstract

In the present study, we analyzed the histological characteristics of osseointegration of an open-porous Ti-6Al-4V material that was produced in a space holder method creating a 3-D through-pores trabecular design that mimics the inhomogeneity and size relationships of trabecular bone in macro- as well as microstructure. Pairs of cylindrical implants with a porosity of 49 % and an average pore diameter of 400 µm (PI) or equal sized solid, corundum blasted devices (SI) as reference were bilaterally implanted press fit in the lateral condyles of 16 rabbits. Histological examination was performed after 4 weeks of short-term osseohealing and 12 weeks of mid-term osseoremodeling and we summarized the criteria for sequential osseointegration. After 4 weeks, osteoid had already been largely replaced by mineralized woven bone in both types of implants but was only represented to a greater extent in the deeper pores of PI. The cortical as well as trabecular region showed regular osseohealing with excessive and spatially undirected formation of immature woven bone. A dense bone mass was found in the cortical area, while in the trabecular region the bone mass was reduced distinctly, presenting large lacuna-like recesses and a demarcating trabecular structure. The pores near the implant surface contained more mineralized woven bone than the deeper pores. After 12 weeks, the osseoremodeling was largely completed with a physiological maturation to lamellar bone. The newly formed bone mass increased for PI and SI compared to the 4-week group and osteoid was only detectable in the deeper pores. The inhomogeneous trabecular design of the pores enables an excellent ingrowth of mineralized lamellar bone after remodeling to a pore depth of 1800 µm, which proves a functional load transfer from the surrounding bone into the implant. According to the concept of osseointegration by Branemark and Albrektsson, the histological evaluation confirms a successful, superior osseointegration of the presented porous properties improving long-term implant stability. The presented study protocol allows an excellent evaluation and comparison of the sequential osseointegration from short-term osseohealing to mid-term osseoremodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33779981     DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.303


  52 in total

Review 1.  Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair-part II: extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; Alexander M Sailon; Stephen M Warren
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response.

Authors:  B D Boyan; T W Hummert; D D Dean; Z Schwartz
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; B O Hansson; R Adell; U Breine; J Lindström; O Hallén; A Ohman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl       Date:  1977

Review 5.  Osseointegration of bone implants. A review of an alternative mode of fixation.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; B Albrektsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-10

Review 6.  Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G A Zarb
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; R M Pilliar; H U Cameron; G C Weatherly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRµCT slices.

Authors:  Ricardo Bernhardt; Eberhard Kuhlisch; Matthias C Schulz; Uwe Eckelt; Bernd Stadlinger
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.942

9.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

Review 10.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Sompop Bencharit; Warren C Byrd; Sandra Altarawneh; Bashir Hosseini; Austin Leong; Glenn Reside; Thiago Morelli; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.932

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.