Literature DB >> 27587914

Evaluation of Speech-Perception Training for Hearing Aid Users: A Multisite Study in Progress.

James D Miller1, Charles S Watson1, Judy R Dubno2, Marjorie R Leek3.   

Abstract

Following an overview of theoretical issues in speech-perception training and of previous efforts to enhance hearing aid use through training, a multisite study, designed to evaluate the efficacy of two types of computerized speech-perception training for adults who use hearing aids, is described. One training method focuses on the identification of 109 syllable constituents (45 onsets, 28 nuclei, and 36 codas) in quiet and in noise, and on the perception of words in sentences presented in various levels of noise. In a second type of training, participants listen to 6- to 7-minute narratives in noise and are asked several questions about each narrative. Two groups of listeners are trained, each using one of these types of training, performed in a laboratory setting. The training for both groups is preceded and followed by a series of speech-perception tests. Subjects listen in a sound field while wearing their hearing aids at their usual settings. The training continues over 15 to 20 visits, with subjects completing at least 30 hours of focused training with one of the two methods. The two types of training are described in detail, together with a summary of other perceptual and cognitive measures obtained from all participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPATS; Speech perception; adaptive training; hearing aid users; signal-to-noise ratio; syllabic constituents

Year:  2015        PMID: 27587914      PMCID: PMC4910538          DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Hear        ISSN: 0734-0451


  31 in total

1.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition.

Authors:  C S Watson; W W Qiu; M M Chamberlain; X Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The Connected Speech Test version 3: audiovisual administration.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore; K M Pusakulich
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version.

Authors:  Charles S Watson; Gary R Kidd; James D Miller; Cas Smits; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: II. Using SPATS software.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Doris J Kistler; Jill E Preminger; David J Wark
Journal:  Hear J       Date:  2008-10

8.  Training listeners to identify the sounds of speech: I. A review of past studies.

Authors:  Charles S Watson; James D Miller; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes; Frederic L Wightman
Journal:  Hear J       Date:  2008-09-01

9.  Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander; C Gilmore; K M Pusakulich
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The effect of LACE DVD training in new and experienced hearing aid users.

Authors:  Anne D Olson; Jill E Preminger; Jennifer B Shinn
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  3 in total

1.  Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Marjorie R Leek; Judy R Dubno; David J Wark; Pamela E Souza; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context.

Authors:  James D Miller; Charles S Watson; Marjorie R Leek; David J Wark; Pamela E Souza; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Improving older adults' understanding of challenging speech: Auditory training, rapid adaptation and perceptual learning.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.