Literature DB >> 8758128

Predictive value of preschool surveillance in detecting learning difficulties.

N Corrigan1, M Stewart, M Scott, F Fee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Hall report specified the early detection of mild to moderate learning difficulties as one aim of child health surveillance (CHS). This study examines the efficacy of preschool CHS in the early recognition of children with these disorders.
DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study.
SUBJECTS: All children (n = 408) with mild to moderate learning difficulties born between 1 July 1983 and 30 June 1984 and resident in North and West Belfast. CONTROLS: 2406 birth records and 150 full child health records controlled for age and geographical area.
RESULTS: The prevalence of mild to moderate learning difficulties in North and West Belfast was 16%. Only 6% of children with learning difficulties were identified by the CHS in the preschool period, although the detection rate for children eventually requiring placement in schools for moderate learning difficulties was better. Coverage of the CHS ranged from 90% at the 2 year examination to 98% at the 4 year examination. Perinatal variables associated with learning difficulties after multiple logistic regression analysis were lower social class (odds ratio (OR) 3.9), prematurity < 35 weeks (OR 3.0), male sex (OR 1.6), and birth to an unmarried mother (OR 0.6). Independent preschool variables identified by the CHS were speech delay (OR 3.3), poor parenting skills (OR 4.0), behaviour problems (OR 2.8), enuresis (OR 2.4), poor visual acuity (OR 1.8), and otitis media with effusion (OR 1.4). A statistical model for the early detection of learning difficulties using these risk factors is unable to predict accurately the children who will develop mild to moderate learning difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: The CHS as it existed from 1983 to 1989 in North and West Belfast was poorly sensitive to the detection of mild to moderate learning difficulties despite excellent coverage. An accurate predictive model for learning difficulties could not be developed from the risk factors documented by the CHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8758128      PMCID: PMC1511568          DOI: 10.1136/adc.74.6.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  12 in total

Review 1.  Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at risk?

Authors:  S J Meisels
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Developmental screening--expecting the impossible?

Authors:  P H Dworkin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Predicting problems in school performance from preschool health, developmental and behavioural assessments.

Authors:  D Cadman; S D Walter; L W Chambers; R Ferguson; P Szatmari; N Johnson; J McNamee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Mild mental retardation in Swedish school children. I. Prevalence.

Authors:  B Hagberg; G Hagberg; A Lewerth; U Lindberg
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1981-07

5.  The new morbidity: use of school and community health care resources for behavioral, educational, and social-family problems.

Authors:  P R Nader; L Ray; S Brink
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  The importance of parents' concerns about their child's development.

Authors:  F P Glascoe; W A Altemeier; W E MacLean
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1989-08

7.  Early identification of developmentally disabled and at-risk preschool children.

Authors:  T T Kochanek; R I Kabacoff; L P Lipsitt
Journal:  Except Child       Date:  1990-04

Review 8.  A comparative review of developmental screening tests.

Authors:  F P Glascoe; E D Martin; S Humphrey
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Effects of biological and social factors on the cognitive development of very low birth weight children.

Authors:  N Weisglas-Kuperus; W Baerts; M Smrkovsky; P J Sauer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Monitoring the developmental examination schedule in an inner city health district.

Authors:  R J Rona; M Allsop; R W Morris
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.508

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fragile X, iron, and neurodevelopmental screening in 8 year old children with mild to moderate learning difficulties.

Authors:  N Corrigan; M Stewart; M Scott; F Fee
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Accuracy of Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) in Detecting Autism and Other Developmental Disorders in Community Clinics.

Authors:  Teck-Hock Toh; Vivian Wee-Yen Tan; Peter Sie-Teck Lau; Andrew Kiyu
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2018-01

3.  Predictive validity of preschool screening tools for language and behavioural difficulties: A PRISMA systematic review.

Authors:  Fiona Sim; Lucy Thompson; Louise Marryat; Nitish Ramparsad; Philip Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.