Literature DB >> 8751596

Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: correlation with age and family history of breast cancer.

B L Smith1, M A Gadd, C Lawler, D J MacDonald, S C Grudberg, F S Chi, K Carlson, A Comegno, W W Souba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A great deal of information about breast cancer risk is available to the public. The accuracy of impressions formed from this information is unknown.
METHODS: A total of 750 women attending a breast center and 112 women attending a primary care office completed written surveys of their perceptions of average population risk, personal lifetime risk, and personal 10-year risk of getting breast cancer. Data sufficient to apply the Gail model were obtained, and a calculated estimate of risk was generated. Ratios of perceived to calculated risk were correlated with the respondent's age, family history of breast cancer, and location in a breast center or primary care office.
RESULTS: Women in both practice settings overestimated population risk by more than twofold. Eighty percent overestimated personal lifetime risk by more than 50% and 35% by more than fivefold. Only 7% significantly underestimated risk. Ten-year risk estimates were even more inaccurate, with 69% overestimating risk by more than fivefold, 46% by more than 10-fold, and 17% by more than 20-fold. Results from a primary care population were nearly identical. Women at the extremes of age were most inaccurate in estimating risk. It was surprising that family history had little impact on perception of personal risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Women in both breast center and primary care settings have a fals:ly high perception of both short-term and long-term breast cancer risk. Health care providers should recognize these misconceptions and be aware that many women may benefit from risk counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8751596     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80301-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  17 in total

1.  Usability Testing of a Web-Based Decision Aid for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Among Multi-Ethnic Women.

Authors:  Austin M Coe; William Ueng; Jennifer M Vargas; Raven David; Alejandro Vanegas; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Haeseung Yi; Jill Dimond; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Austin M Coe; Alejandro Vanegas; Rita Kukafka; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-06-13

3.  Black-white differences in risk perceptions of breast cancer survival and screening mammography benefit.

Authors:  David A Haggstrom; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Use of hormone replacement therapy among cardiac patients at a Canadian academic centre.

Authors:  M R Wise; D E Stewart; P Liu; B L Abramson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-07-13       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Mammography screening among Chinese-American women.

Authors:  Shin-Ping Tu; Yutaka Yasui; Alan A Kuniyuki; Stephen M Schwartz; J Carey Jackson; Thomas Gregory Hislop; Vicky Taylor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Pilot study of an information aid for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Vivek Goel; Nancy Ondrusek; Elaine C. Thiel; H. Lavina; A. Lickley; Pamela L. Chart; Wendy S. Meschino; Brian D. Doan; June C. Carroll; Kathryn M. Taylor
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools.

Authors:  Haeseung Yi; Tong Xiao; Parijatham S Thomas; Alejandra N Aguirre; Cindy Smalletz; Jill Dimond; Joseph Finkelstein; Katherine Infante; Meghna Trivedi; Raven David; Jennifer Vargas; Katherine D Crew; Rita Kukafka
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

8.  Gail model risk assessment and risk perceptions.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Elizabeth Fries; Donna McClish; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2004-04

9.  Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population.

Authors:  Susan L Davids; Marilyn M Schapira; Timothy L McAuliffe; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"

Authors:  Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia; Christine M Gunn
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.