Literature DB >> 33455518

Discussions of Potential Mammography Benefits and Harms among Patients with Limited Health Literacy and Providers: "Oh, There are Harms?"

Ariel Maschke1, Michael K Paasche-Orlow2, Nancy R Kressin2, Mara A Schonberg3, Tracy A Battaglia1, Christine M Gunn1,2,4.   

Abstract

Starting breast cancer screening at age 40 versus 50 may increase potential harms frequency with a small mortality benefit. Younger women's screening decisions, therefore, may be complex. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended for women under 50 and may support women under 55 for whom guidelines vary. How women with limited health literacy (LHL) approach breast cancer screening decision-making is less understood, and most SDM tools are not designed with their input. This phenomenological study sought to characterize mammography counseling experiences among women with LHL and primary care providers (PCPs). Women ages 40-54 with LHL who had no history of breast cancer or mammogram within 9 months were approached before a primary care visit at a safety-net hospital. PCPs at this site were invited to participate. Qualitative interviews explored mammography counseling experiences. Patients also reviewed sample information materials. A constant comparison technique generated four themes salient to 25 patients and 20 PCPs: addressing family history versus comprehensive risk assessment; potential mammography harms discussions; information delivery preferences; and integrating pre-visit information tools. Findings suggest that current counseling techniques may not be responsive to patient-identified needs. Opportunities exist to improve how mammography information is shared and increase accessibility across the health literacy spectrum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33455518      PMCID: PMC8062298          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1845256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  73 in total

1.  Helping patients decide: ten steps to better risk communication.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Minority patient preferences, barriers, and facilitators for shared decision-making with health care providers in the USA: A systematic review.

Authors:  Monica Perez Jolles; Jennifer Richmond; Kathleen C Thomas
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-02-10

4.  The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erin Freed; Debra Long; Tonantzin Rodriguez; Peter Franks; Richard L Kravitz; Anthony Jerant
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-03-26

5.  Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Paul Kearney; Lyndal Trevena; Alexandra Barratt; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  "There is nothing to worry about": gynecologists' counseling on mammography.

Authors:  Odette Wegwarth; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-08-16

7.  Breast cancer risk assessment and management in primary care: provider attitudes, practices, and barriers.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Ellen P McCarthy; Russell S Phillips; Risa B Burns
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2007-11-26

8.  Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; L D Burnell; P Hopwood; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Lewis Carpenter; Hayley Dolan; Paulina Bravo; Mala Mann; Frances Bunn; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids.

Authors:  Kirsten J McCaffery; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sian K Smith; David Rovner; Don Nutbeam; Marla L Clayman; Karen Kelly-Blake; Michael S Wolf; Stacey L Sheridan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of Breast Cancer Awareness Month on Public Interest in the United States between 2012 and 2021: A Google Trends Analysis.

Authors:  Yoshito Nishimura; Jared D Acoba
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Using Mixed Methods With Multiple Stakeholders to Inform Development of a Breast Cancer Screening Decision Aid for Women With Limited Health Literacy.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Ashley J Housten; Nancy R Kressin; Mara A Schonberg; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  MDM Policy Pract       Date:  2021-07-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.