Literature DB >> 8747178

Covert orienting to non-informative cues: reaction time studies.

G Tassinari1, G Berlucchi.   

Abstract

Lateralized, non-informative visual cues lengthen reaction time (RT) to successive targets flashed in the same hemified. Early ipsilateral RT facilitation is limited to the co-occurrence of cues and targets. Inhibition from visual cues has sensory components which do not depend on orienting, as well as attentional components which are limited to one side of the vertical meridian. An inhibition of RT to targets ipsilateral to the cues has been found with somatic or auditory cues and targets, and also when somatic targets follow visual cues or visual targets follow somatic cues. The results reviewed in this paper (1) are best accounted for by directional constraints in motor readiness which are induced by the voluntary suppression of an overt orienting toward the location of the cue; (2) indicate that similar mechanisms of covert orienting operate in the whole peripersonal and near extrapersonal space; and (3) point to a common neural substrate mediating both intramodal and cross-modal effects.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8747178     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00201-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks.

Authors:  Jim McAuliffe; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-07-03

4.  Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults.

Authors:  Srikant Jayaraman; Raymond M Klein; Matthew D Hilchey; Gouri Shanker Patil; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye gaze and head orientation modulate the inhibition of return for faces.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Auditory cues and inhibition of return: the importance of oculomotor activation.

Authors:  P A Reuter-Lorenz; J N Rosenquist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neural correlate of auditory spatial attention allocation in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Abigail Z Rajala; Rick L Jenison; Luis C Populin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Multisensory perceptual learning reshapes both fast and slow mechanisms of crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Melissa A Batson; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Effects of a pretarget distractor on saccade reaction times across space and time in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Douglas P Munoz; Naomi Takahashi; Gunnar Blohm; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.